File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Conference Paper: Effect of spatial allocation of green infrastructure on surface-subsurface hydrology in shallow groundwater environment

TitleEffect of spatial allocation of green infrastructure on surface-subsurface hydrology in shallow groundwater environment
Authors
KeywordsGreen infrastructure
Groundwater recharge
MODFLOW
Spatial allocation
Stormwater
SWMM
Issue Date2019
PublisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers. The Proceedings' web site is located at https://ascelibrary.org/doi/book/10.1061/9780784482360
Citation
World Environmental and Water Resources Congress 2019: Water, Wastewater, and Stormwater; Urban Water Resources; and Municipal Water Infrastructure, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA, 19-23 May 2019, p. 147-152 How to Cite?
AbstractGreen infrastructure (GI) controls surface runoff and restores pre-development hydrological conditions in a more environmental-friendly way. However, shallow groundwater restricts the implementation of GI due to possible groundwater contamination, groundwater flooding, and decline of surface runoff control efficiency. Thus, it is challenging to strike a balance between surface runoff control and groundwater protection. Some design methods have been proposed, but knowledge on how to allocate GI to maximize the benefits and minimize the problems is limited. This study utilized a loosely-coupled hydrological model, named SWMM-MODFLOW, to examine the impact of spatial allocation of GI on surface hydrological performance (e.g., peak and volume reduction of surface runoff and flow of catchment outlet) and groundwater table dynamics (e.g., maximum height of groundwater mound) at an urban catchment at the Kitsap County, Washington State, of the U.S. GI showed good performance in surface runoff reduction even in shallow groundwater environment. It enhanced the formation of groundwater mound but the effect was localized. Porous pavements showed better performance than bioretention cells, particularly in the peak and volume reduction of surface runoff. Bioretention cells allocated aggregately showed slightly better runoff reduction than that allocated distributedly, and GI in upstream areas generated greater groundwater mound than that in downstream areas. The results of this study provide some references for allocating GI in the catchment scale considering surface and subsurface hydrology in shallow groundwater environment.
DescriptionSelected Papers from the World Environmental and Water Resources Congress 2019
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/275407
ISBN

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorZhang, K-
dc.contributor.authorChui, TFM-
dc.date.accessioned2019-09-10T02:41:57Z-
dc.date.available2019-09-10T02:41:57Z-
dc.date.issued2019-
dc.identifier.citationWorld Environmental and Water Resources Congress 2019: Water, Wastewater, and Stormwater; Urban Water Resources; and Municipal Water Infrastructure, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA, 19-23 May 2019, p. 147-152-
dc.identifier.isbn978-1-5108-8736-7-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/275407-
dc.descriptionSelected Papers from the World Environmental and Water Resources Congress 2019-
dc.description.abstractGreen infrastructure (GI) controls surface runoff and restores pre-development hydrological conditions in a more environmental-friendly way. However, shallow groundwater restricts the implementation of GI due to possible groundwater contamination, groundwater flooding, and decline of surface runoff control efficiency. Thus, it is challenging to strike a balance between surface runoff control and groundwater protection. Some design methods have been proposed, but knowledge on how to allocate GI to maximize the benefits and minimize the problems is limited. This study utilized a loosely-coupled hydrological model, named SWMM-MODFLOW, to examine the impact of spatial allocation of GI on surface hydrological performance (e.g., peak and volume reduction of surface runoff and flow of catchment outlet) and groundwater table dynamics (e.g., maximum height of groundwater mound) at an urban catchment at the Kitsap County, Washington State, of the U.S. GI showed good performance in surface runoff reduction even in shallow groundwater environment. It enhanced the formation of groundwater mound but the effect was localized. Porous pavements showed better performance than bioretention cells, particularly in the peak and volume reduction of surface runoff. Bioretention cells allocated aggregately showed slightly better runoff reduction than that allocated distributedly, and GI in upstream areas generated greater groundwater mound than that in downstream areas. The results of this study provide some references for allocating GI in the catchment scale considering surface and subsurface hydrology in shallow groundwater environment.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers. The Proceedings' web site is located at https://ascelibrary.org/doi/book/10.1061/9780784482360-
dc.relation.ispartofWorld Environmental & Water Resources Congress 2019: Water, Wastewater, and Stormwater; Urban Water Resources; and Municipal Water Infrastructure-
dc.rightsWorld Environmental & Water Resources Congress 2019: Water, Wastewater, and Stormwater; Urban Water Resources; and Municipal Water Infrastructure. Copyright © American Society of Civil Engineers.-
dc.subjectGreen infrastructure-
dc.subjectGroundwater recharge-
dc.subjectMODFLOW-
dc.subjectSpatial allocation-
dc.subjectStormwater-
dc.subjectSWMM-
dc.titleEffect of spatial allocation of green infrastructure on surface-subsurface hydrology in shallow groundwater environment-
dc.typeConference_Paper-
dc.identifier.emailChui, TFM: maychui@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.authorityChui, TFM=rp01696-
dc.identifier.doi10.1061/9780784482360.015-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85067275037-
dc.identifier.hkuros304860-
dc.identifier.spage147-
dc.identifier.epage152-
dc.publisher.placeReston, VA-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats