File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: CEO hubris and firm risk taking in China: the moderating role of managerial discretion

TitleCEO hubris and firm risk taking in China: the moderating role of managerial discretion
Authors
Issue Date2010
Citation
Academy of Management Journal, 2010, v. 53, n. 1, p. 45-68 How to Cite?
AbstractThis study linked CEO hubris to firm risk taking and examined the moderating role of managerial discretion in this relationship. Drawing on upper echelons theory and behavioral decision theory, we developed and tested hypotheses using original survey data from 2,790 CEOs of diverse manufacturing firms in China. The positive relationship between CEO hubris and firm risk taking was found to be stronger when CEO managerial discretion was stronger: when a firm faced munificent but complex markets; had less inertia and more intangible resources; had a CEO who also chaired its board; and had a CEO who was not politically appointed. © 2010 Academy of Management Journal.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/273500
ISSN
2021 Impact Factor: 10.979
2020 SCImago Journal Rankings: 11.193
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLi, Jiatao-
dc.contributor.authorTang, Yi-
dc.date.accessioned2019-08-12T09:55:46Z-
dc.date.available2019-08-12T09:55:46Z-
dc.date.issued2010-
dc.identifier.citationAcademy of Management Journal, 2010, v. 53, n. 1, p. 45-68-
dc.identifier.issn0001-4273-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/273500-
dc.description.abstractThis study linked CEO hubris to firm risk taking and examined the moderating role of managerial discretion in this relationship. Drawing on upper echelons theory and behavioral decision theory, we developed and tested hypotheses using original survey data from 2,790 CEOs of diverse manufacturing firms in China. The positive relationship between CEO hubris and firm risk taking was found to be stronger when CEO managerial discretion was stronger: when a firm faced munificent but complex markets; had less inertia and more intangible resources; had a CEO who also chaired its board; and had a CEO who was not politically appointed. © 2010 Academy of Management Journal.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofAcademy of Management Journal-
dc.titleCEO hubris and firm risk taking in China: the moderating role of managerial discretion-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.5465/amj.2010.48036912-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-77149172576-
dc.identifier.volume53-
dc.identifier.issue1-
dc.identifier.spage45-
dc.identifier.epage68-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000275345300003-
dc.identifier.issnl0001-4273-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats