File Download
  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Can fMRI discriminate between deception and false memory? A meta-analytic comparison between deception and false memory studies

TitleCan fMRI discriminate between deception and false memory? A meta-analytic comparison between deception and false memory studies
Authors
KeywordsDeception
false memory
fMRI
meta-analysis
Issue Date2019
PublisherPergamon. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.elsevier.com/locate/neubiorev
Citation
Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 2019, v. 104, p. 43-55 How to Cite?
AbstractPrevious research has highlighted the potential of fMRI in discriminating between truth and falsehood. However, falsehoods may not necessarily represent a deliberate intention to deceive; they can be a result of false memory too. It is important to show that fMRI can discriminate between deception and false memory, before it can be applied in legal contexts for deception detection. To this end, we performed a meta-analytic comparison of brain activation between deception and false memory. Activation likelihood estimation meta-analyses were conducted separately on 49 deception (61 contrasts; Ntotal = 991) and 28 false memory (32 contrasts; Ntotal = 484) studies. The contrasts obtained from these meta-analyses were entered into subsequent conjunction and contrast analyses. Deception and false memory tasks activated several frontoparietal regions. Both tasks activated the left superior frontal gyrus. Deception, relative to false memory, was associated with increased activation in the right superior temporal gyrus, right insula, left inferior parietal lobule and right superior frontal gyrus. These results provide some evidence to suggest that fMRI can discriminate between deception and false memory.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/272667
ISSN
2017 Impact Factor: 8.037
2015 SCImago Journal Rankings: 5.290

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorYU, J-
dc.contributor.authorTao, Q-
dc.contributor.authorZhang, R-
dc.contributor.authorChan, CCH-
dc.contributor.authorLee, TMC-
dc.date.accessioned2019-08-06T09:14:16Z-
dc.date.available2019-08-06T09:14:16Z-
dc.date.issued2019-
dc.identifier.citationNeuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 2019, v. 104, p. 43-55-
dc.identifier.issn0149-7634-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/272667-
dc.description.abstractPrevious research has highlighted the potential of fMRI in discriminating between truth and falsehood. However, falsehoods may not necessarily represent a deliberate intention to deceive; they can be a result of false memory too. It is important to show that fMRI can discriminate between deception and false memory, before it can be applied in legal contexts for deception detection. To this end, we performed a meta-analytic comparison of brain activation between deception and false memory. Activation likelihood estimation meta-analyses were conducted separately on 49 deception (61 contrasts; Ntotal = 991) and 28 false memory (32 contrasts; Ntotal = 484) studies. The contrasts obtained from these meta-analyses were entered into subsequent conjunction and contrast analyses. Deception and false memory tasks activated several frontoparietal regions. Both tasks activated the left superior frontal gyrus. Deception, relative to false memory, was associated with increased activation in the right superior temporal gyrus, right insula, left inferior parietal lobule and right superior frontal gyrus. These results provide some evidence to suggest that fMRI can discriminate between deception and false memory.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherPergamon. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.elsevier.com/locate/neubiorev-
dc.relation.ispartofNeuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.subjectDeception-
dc.subjectfalse memory-
dc.subjectfMRI-
dc.subjectmeta-analysis-
dc.titleCan fMRI discriminate between deception and false memory? A meta-analytic comparison between deception and false memory studies-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.emailLee, TMC: tmclee@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.authorityLee, TMC=rp00564-
dc.description.naturepublished_or_final_version-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.06.027-
dc.identifier.pmid31251965-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85068261922-
dc.identifier.hkuros300937-
dc.identifier.volume104-
dc.identifier.spage43-
dc.identifier.epage55-
dc.publisher.placeUnited Kingdom-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats