File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1016/j.rse.2018.03.019
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-85044455257
- WOS: WOS:000431164300021
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Measuring short-term post-fire forest recovery across a burn severity gradient in a mixed pine-oak forest using multi-sensor remote sensing techniques
Title | Measuring short-term post-fire forest recovery across a burn severity gradient in a mixed pine-oak forest using multi-sensor remote sensing techniques |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | Burn severity Forest composition and structure Fire adaptive strategies WorldView-2 Vegetation classification Species-specific post-fire responses Hyperspectral data |
Issue Date | 2018 |
Citation | Remote Sensing of Environment, 2018, v. 210, p. 282-296 How to Cite? |
Abstract | © 2018 Elsevier Inc. Understanding post-fire forest recovery is pivotal to the study of forest dynamics and global carbon cycle. Field-based studies indicated a convex response of forest recovery rate to burn severity at the individual tree level, related with fire-induced tree mortality; however, these findings were constrained in spatial/temporal extents, while not detectable by traditional optical remote sensing studies, largely attributing to the contaminated effect from understory recovery. Here, we examined whether the combined use of multi-sensor remote sensing techniques (i.e., 1 m simultaneous airborne imaging spectroscopy and LiDAR and 2 m satellite multi-spectral imagery) to separate canopy recovery from understory recovery would enable to quantify post-fire forest recovery rate spanning a large gradient in burn severity over large-scales. Our study was conducted in a mixed pine-oak forest in Long Island, NY, three years after a top-killing fire. Our studies remotely detected an initial increase and then decline of forest recovery rate to burn severity across the burned area, with a maximum canopy area-based recovery rate of 10% per year at moderate forest burn severity class. More intriguingly, such remotely detected convex relationships also held at species level, with pine trees being more resilient to high burn severity and having a higher maximum recovery rate (12% per year) than oak trees (4% per year). These results are one of the first quantitative evidences showing the effects of fire adaptive strategies on post-fire forest recovery, derived from relatively large spatial-temporal scales. Our study thus provides the methodological advance to link multi-sensor remote sensing techniques to monitor forest dynamics in a spatially explicit manner over large-scales, with important implications for fire-related forest management and constraining/benchmarking fire effect schemes in ecological process models. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/266828 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 11.1 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 4.310 |
ISI Accession Number ID |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Meng, Ran | - |
dc.contributor.author | Wu, Jin | - |
dc.contributor.author | Zhao, Feng | - |
dc.contributor.author | Cook, Bruce D. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Hanavan, Ryan P. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Serbin, Shawn P. | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-01-31T07:19:43Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2019-01-31T07:19:43Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2018 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Remote Sensing of Environment, 2018, v. 210, p. 282-296 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0034-4257 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/266828 | - |
dc.description.abstract | © 2018 Elsevier Inc. Understanding post-fire forest recovery is pivotal to the study of forest dynamics and global carbon cycle. Field-based studies indicated a convex response of forest recovery rate to burn severity at the individual tree level, related with fire-induced tree mortality; however, these findings were constrained in spatial/temporal extents, while not detectable by traditional optical remote sensing studies, largely attributing to the contaminated effect from understory recovery. Here, we examined whether the combined use of multi-sensor remote sensing techniques (i.e., 1 m simultaneous airborne imaging spectroscopy and LiDAR and 2 m satellite multi-spectral imagery) to separate canopy recovery from understory recovery would enable to quantify post-fire forest recovery rate spanning a large gradient in burn severity over large-scales. Our study was conducted in a mixed pine-oak forest in Long Island, NY, three years after a top-killing fire. Our studies remotely detected an initial increase and then decline of forest recovery rate to burn severity across the burned area, with a maximum canopy area-based recovery rate of 10% per year at moderate forest burn severity class. More intriguingly, such remotely detected convex relationships also held at species level, with pine trees being more resilient to high burn severity and having a higher maximum recovery rate (12% per year) than oak trees (4% per year). These results are one of the first quantitative evidences showing the effects of fire adaptive strategies on post-fire forest recovery, derived from relatively large spatial-temporal scales. Our study thus provides the methodological advance to link multi-sensor remote sensing techniques to monitor forest dynamics in a spatially explicit manner over large-scales, with important implications for fire-related forest management and constraining/benchmarking fire effect schemes in ecological process models. | - |
dc.language | eng | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | Remote Sensing of Environment | - |
dc.subject | Burn severity | - |
dc.subject | Forest composition and structure | - |
dc.subject | Fire adaptive strategies | - |
dc.subject | WorldView-2 | - |
dc.subject | Vegetation classification | - |
dc.subject | Species-specific post-fire responses | - |
dc.subject | Hyperspectral data | - |
dc.title | Measuring short-term post-fire forest recovery across a burn severity gradient in a mixed pine-oak forest using multi-sensor remote sensing techniques | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.rse.2018.03.019 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-85044455257 | - |
dc.identifier.volume | 210 | - |
dc.identifier.spage | 282 | - |
dc.identifier.epage | 296 | - |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000431164300021 | - |
dc.identifier.issnl | 0034-4257 | - |