File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
  • Find via Find It@HKUL
Supplementary

Article: POSPD: Alternative Commons in Hong Kong

TitlePOSPD: Alternative Commons in Hong Kong
「私人發展公眾休憩空間」: 香港的另類共享空間
Authors
Issue Date2017
PublisherHong Kong Institute of Architects. The Journal's web site is located at http://hkia-journal.net/
Citation
HKIA Journal, 2017, v. 73, p. 119-121 How to Cite?
香港建築師學報, 2017, v. 73, p. 119-121 How to Cite?
AbstractNormally in a citizenship-conscious society, by nature spaces are subdivided bilaterally, i.e. privately owned and publicly owned whereby the accessibility to these spaces is defined accordingly. However, when the city is getting more sophisticated, new types of spaces are emerging to allow or accommodate uses to enhance social functioning, like connectivity, multiple-usage, etc. Along this line, POPS in New York, POSPD in Hong Kong and other similar spaces where the identity of public and private ownership may be overlapped to meet new needs of the society. POSPD is also associated with planning gain that developers proposed to be included in the lease conditions. From the Times Square Incident to the development of POSPD guidelines, the author tries to highlight the principles and challenges of POSPD in the future.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/262292
ISSN

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorChang, WPH-
dc.date.accessioned2018-09-28T04:56:48Z-
dc.date.available2018-09-28T04:56:48Z-
dc.date.issued2017-
dc.identifier.citationHKIA Journal, 2017, v. 73, p. 119-121-
dc.identifier.citation香港建築師學報, 2017, v. 73, p. 119-121-
dc.identifier.issn1028-4842-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/262292-
dc.description.abstractNormally in a citizenship-conscious society, by nature spaces are subdivided bilaterally, i.e. privately owned and publicly owned whereby the accessibility to these spaces is defined accordingly. However, when the city is getting more sophisticated, new types of spaces are emerging to allow or accommodate uses to enhance social functioning, like connectivity, multiple-usage, etc. Along this line, POPS in New York, POSPD in Hong Kong and other similar spaces where the identity of public and private ownership may be overlapped to meet new needs of the society. POSPD is also associated with planning gain that developers proposed to be included in the lease conditions. From the Times Square Incident to the development of POSPD guidelines, the author tries to highlight the principles and challenges of POSPD in the future.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherHong Kong Institute of Architects. The Journal's web site is located at http://hkia-journal.net/-
dc.relation.ispartofHKIA Journal-
dc.relation.ispartof香港建築師學報-
dc.titlePOSPD: Alternative Commons in Hong Kong-
dc.title「私人發展公眾休憩空間」: 香港的另類共享空間-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.emailChang, WPH: phchang@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.authorityChang, WPH=rp02209-
dc.identifier.hkuros292630-
dc.identifier.volume73-
dc.identifier.spage119-
dc.identifier.epage121-
dc.publisher.placeHong Kong-
dc.identifier.issnl1028-4842-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats