File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: A comparative study of registration system of real estate between Hong Kong and mainland China

TitleA comparative study of registration system of real estate between Hong Kong and mainland China
Authors
Issue Date2018
PublisherEmerald. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.emeraldinsight.com/info/journals/pm/pm.jsp
Citation
Property Management, 2018, v. 1, p. 5-19 How to Cite?
AbstractPurpose The purpose of this paper is to review land/real estate registration practice in Hong Kong, and make an in-depth comparison with Mainland China and finally provide helpful suggestions for the government. Design/methodology/approach Research methods including document analysis/review and comparative study are used in this paper. Findings The main findings focus on the problems existing in the mainland, including narrow query subject, single way of query, limited query time, and lacking of incentive mechanism. Helpful suggestions for real estate registration system in Mainland China are offered based on the comparative study. Practical implications The unified registration system can improve the efficiency of administrative institutions to ensure an open and transparent environment of property right registration, which helps prevent the relevant departments from abusing administrative power and harming the interests of obligees. The findings of this research can serve as a useful reference for policy makers to improve the unified registration system in China. Originality/value The registration system/mechanism determines the efficiency and effectiveness of real estate/land market. However, land registration and query in some countries such as Mainland China have institutional problems which hinder the sustained and healthy development of the real estate industry. The value of this paper is to propose constructive suggestions for such countries/regions by comparing and learning from a good model.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/260911
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorWang, H-
dc.contributor.authorWei, S-
dc.contributor.authorTang, BS-
dc.contributor.authorChen, J-
dc.contributor.authorLi, W-
dc.date.accessioned2018-09-14T08:49:25Z-
dc.date.available2018-09-14T08:49:25Z-
dc.date.issued2018-
dc.identifier.citationProperty Management, 2018, v. 1, p. 5-19-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/260911-
dc.description.abstractPurpose The purpose of this paper is to review land/real estate registration practice in Hong Kong, and make an in-depth comparison with Mainland China and finally provide helpful suggestions for the government. Design/methodology/approach Research methods including document analysis/review and comparative study are used in this paper. Findings The main findings focus on the problems existing in the mainland, including narrow query subject, single way of query, limited query time, and lacking of incentive mechanism. Helpful suggestions for real estate registration system in Mainland China are offered based on the comparative study. Practical implications The unified registration system can improve the efficiency of administrative institutions to ensure an open and transparent environment of property right registration, which helps prevent the relevant departments from abusing administrative power and harming the interests of obligees. The findings of this research can serve as a useful reference for policy makers to improve the unified registration system in China. Originality/value The registration system/mechanism determines the efficiency and effectiveness of real estate/land market. However, land registration and query in some countries such as Mainland China have institutional problems which hinder the sustained and healthy development of the real estate industry. The value of this paper is to propose constructive suggestions for such countries/regions by comparing and learning from a good model.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherEmerald. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.emeraldinsight.com/info/journals/pm/pm.jsp-
dc.relation.ispartofProperty Management-
dc.rightsThis article is © Emerald Group Publishing and permission has been granted for this version to appear here (please insert the web address here). Emerald does not grant permission for this article to be further copied/distributed or hosted elsewhere without the express permission from Emerald Group Publishing Limited.-
dc.titleA comparative study of registration system of real estate between Hong Kong and mainland China-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.emailTang, BS: bsbstang@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.authorityTang, BS=rp01646-
dc.identifier.doi10.1108/PM-08-2016-0044-
dc.identifier.hkuros291248-
dc.identifier.volume1-
dc.identifier.spage5-
dc.identifier.epage19-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000424464100002-
dc.publisher.placeUK-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats