File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

Supplementary

Conference Paper: Validity and Reliability Assessments for Evaluating Oral Hygiene Apps

TitleValidity and Reliability Assessments for Evaluating Oral Hygiene Apps
Authors
Issue Date2018
PublisherInternational Association for Dental Research. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.iadr.org/
Citation
The 96th General Session and Exhibition of the International Association for Dental Research (IADR) and IADR Pan European Regional (PER) Congress, London, UK, 25-28 July 2018. In Journal of Dental Research, 2018, v. 97 n. Spec Iss B, abstract no. 1125 How to Cite?
AbstractObjectives: There is an increase in the development of ‘Apps’ (applications for smartphones and computers) to promote oral health. However, there is a lack of standardized approaches to the assessment of the validity and reliability of such Apps. This study aimed to assess the validity and reliability of a standardized approach to evaluate an Oral Hygiene App. Methods: As part of a clinical trial, preschool children (282) were asked to perform the task of tooth brushing in their usual way and their performance rated independently on a standardized 13-step assessment. Time spent brushing was also recorded by stopwatch. A clinical oral examination of oral hygiene status was conducted masked of tooth brushing performance using the Silness-Löe plaque index (PI). Primary caregiver (PCG) independently (and prior to other assessments) provided reports of children tooth brushing behaviour. Results: Assessments were completed on all children. Performance in tooth brushing (13-steps) was significantly associated with PCG reports of frequency of tooth brushing behaviour (P<0.001) and time spent tooth brushing (p<0.01). Recoded time spent brushing was significantly associated with PCG reports of time spent tooth brushing (p<0.001). This established concurrent validity. Performance in tooth brushing (13-steps) was significantly correlated with time spent tooth brushing (r 0.72, P<0.001). Performance in tooth brushing (13-steps) was significantly correlated with PI scores (r 0.67, P<0.001). This established construct validity. The Cronbach alpha value of the 13-step performance of tooth brushing assessment was 0.74, confirming internal reliability. The Intraclass correlation coefficient value of repeat assessments among 60 participants (~20% of sample) was 0.83, confirming test-retest reliability. Conclusions: The standardized approach to assessing an App for oral hygiene was valid and reliable. This has implications for evaluating oral hygiene Apps in a standardized way to facilitate the evidence base of Apps for oral health.
DescriptionPoster Presentation - no. 1125
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/260674

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMcGrath, CPJ-
dc.contributor.authorYiu, CKY-
dc.contributor.authorHo, T-
dc.date.accessioned2018-09-14T08:45:29Z-
dc.date.available2018-09-14T08:45:29Z-
dc.date.issued2018-
dc.identifier.citationThe 96th General Session and Exhibition of the International Association for Dental Research (IADR) and IADR Pan European Regional (PER) Congress, London, UK, 25-28 July 2018. In Journal of Dental Research, 2018, v. 97 n. Spec Iss B, abstract no. 1125-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/260674-
dc.descriptionPoster Presentation - no. 1125-
dc.description.abstractObjectives: There is an increase in the development of ‘Apps’ (applications for smartphones and computers) to promote oral health. However, there is a lack of standardized approaches to the assessment of the validity and reliability of such Apps. This study aimed to assess the validity and reliability of a standardized approach to evaluate an Oral Hygiene App. Methods: As part of a clinical trial, preschool children (282) were asked to perform the task of tooth brushing in their usual way and their performance rated independently on a standardized 13-step assessment. Time spent brushing was also recorded by stopwatch. A clinical oral examination of oral hygiene status was conducted masked of tooth brushing performance using the Silness-Löe plaque index (PI). Primary caregiver (PCG) independently (and prior to other assessments) provided reports of children tooth brushing behaviour. Results: Assessments were completed on all children. Performance in tooth brushing (13-steps) was significantly associated with PCG reports of frequency of tooth brushing behaviour (P<0.001) and time spent tooth brushing (p<0.01). Recoded time spent brushing was significantly associated with PCG reports of time spent tooth brushing (p<0.001). This established concurrent validity. Performance in tooth brushing (13-steps) was significantly correlated with time spent tooth brushing (r 0.72, P<0.001). Performance in tooth brushing (13-steps) was significantly correlated with PI scores (r 0.67, P<0.001). This established construct validity. The Cronbach alpha value of the 13-step performance of tooth brushing assessment was 0.74, confirming internal reliability. The Intraclass correlation coefficient value of repeat assessments among 60 participants (~20% of sample) was 0.83, confirming test-retest reliability. Conclusions: The standardized approach to assessing an App for oral hygiene was valid and reliable. This has implications for evaluating oral hygiene Apps in a standardized way to facilitate the evidence base of Apps for oral health.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherInternational Association for Dental Research. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.iadr.org/-
dc.relation.ispartofIADR/PER 96th General Session & Exhibition-
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Dental Research (Spec Issue)-
dc.titleValidity and Reliability Assessments for Evaluating Oral Hygiene Apps-
dc.typeConference_Paper-
dc.identifier.emailMcGrath, CPJ: mcgrathc@hkucc.hku.hk-
dc.identifier.emailYiu, CKY: ckyyiu@hkucc.hku.hk-
dc.identifier.authorityMcGrath, CPJ=rp00037-
dc.identifier.authorityYiu, CKY=rp00018-
dc.identifier.hkuros291608-
dc.identifier.volume97-
dc.identifier.issueSpec Iss B-
dc.identifier.spageabstract no. 1125-
dc.identifier.epageabstract no. 1125-
dc.publisher.placeUnited States-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats