File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: The political economy of land reform in China's "newly liberated areas": Evidence from Wuxi County

TitleThe political economy of land reform in China's "newly liberated areas": Evidence from Wuxi County
Authors
Issue Date2008
Citation
China Quarterly, 2008, n. 195, p. 675-690 How to Cite?
AbstractA farm survey conducted in Wuxi county in the 1950s found that the Chinese Communist Party had successfully "preserved the rich peasant economy" in the "newly liberated areas": the landlords were indeed the only social class whose properties had been redistributed, yet without compromising on the magnitude of benefits received by the poor peasants. A higher land inequality in that region, coupled with an inter-village transfer of land, allowed these dual goals to be achieved. Our study further reveals that class status was determined both by the amount of land a household owned and whether it had committed certain "exploitative acts," which explains why some landlords did not own a vast amount of land. Conversely, it was the amount of land owned, not class status, that determined redistributive entitlements, which was why 15 per cent of the poor peasants and half of the middle peasants were not redistributed any land. © 2008 The China Quarterly.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/256977
ISSN
2021 Impact Factor: 2.231
2020 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.161
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKung, James Kai Sing-
dc.date.accessioned2018-07-24T08:58:30Z-
dc.date.available2018-07-24T08:58:30Z-
dc.date.issued2008-
dc.identifier.citationChina Quarterly, 2008, n. 195, p. 675-690-
dc.identifier.issn0305-7410-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/256977-
dc.description.abstractA farm survey conducted in Wuxi county in the 1950s found that the Chinese Communist Party had successfully "preserved the rich peasant economy" in the "newly liberated areas": the landlords were indeed the only social class whose properties had been redistributed, yet without compromising on the magnitude of benefits received by the poor peasants. A higher land inequality in that region, coupled with an inter-village transfer of land, allowed these dual goals to be achieved. Our study further reveals that class status was determined both by the amount of land a household owned and whether it had committed certain "exploitative acts," which explains why some landlords did not own a vast amount of land. Conversely, it was the amount of land owned, not class status, that determined redistributive entitlements, which was why 15 per cent of the poor peasants and half of the middle peasants were not redistributed any land. © 2008 The China Quarterly.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofChina Quarterly-
dc.titleThe political economy of land reform in China's "newly liberated areas": Evidence from Wuxi County-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1017/S0305741008000829-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-51849085218-
dc.identifier.issue195-
dc.identifier.spage675-
dc.identifier.epage690-
dc.identifier.eissn1468-2648-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000259846800008-
dc.identifier.issnl0305-7410-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats