File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Do secure land use rights reduce fertility? The case of Meitan county in China

TitleDo secure land use rights reduce fertility? The case of Meitan county in China
Authors
Issue Date2006
Citation
Land Economics, 2006, v. 82, n. 1, p. 36-55 How to Cite?
AbstractBased on the belief that collective landownership is pro-natalist, the Chinese government experimented in a remote southwestern county (Meitan) in 1987 with the practice of freezing land reallocations in response to demographic change for twenty years. Premising on the norm of a two-children family in rural China, evidence suggests that demand for the third child is attributable to strong son preference. Neither secured land rights nor family planning policy can curb such a proclivity. The experiment has, however, stimulated an active land rental market, which may have long-term profound implications for the development of private land rights and fertility behavior. © 2006 by the Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/256918
ISSN
2021 Impact Factor: 2.030
2020 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.961
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKung, James Kai Sing-
dc.date.accessioned2018-07-24T08:58:20Z-
dc.date.available2018-07-24T08:58:20Z-
dc.date.issued2006-
dc.identifier.citationLand Economics, 2006, v. 82, n. 1, p. 36-55-
dc.identifier.issn0023-7639-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/256918-
dc.description.abstractBased on the belief that collective landownership is pro-natalist, the Chinese government experimented in a remote southwestern county (Meitan) in 1987 with the practice of freezing land reallocations in response to demographic change for twenty years. Premising on the norm of a two-children family in rural China, evidence suggests that demand for the third child is attributable to strong son preference. Neither secured land rights nor family planning policy can curb such a proclivity. The experiment has, however, stimulated an active land rental market, which may have long-term profound implications for the development of private land rights and fertility behavior. © 2006 by the Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofLand Economics-
dc.titleDo secure land use rights reduce fertility? The case of Meitan county in China-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.colsurfb.2005.11.019-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-33644694191-
dc.identifier.volume82-
dc.identifier.issue1-
dc.identifier.spage36-
dc.identifier.epage55-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000235102600005-
dc.identifier.issnl0023-7639-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats