File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Global South Solidarity? China, Regional Organisations and Intervention in the Libyan and Syrian Civil Wars

TitleGlobal South Solidarity? China, Regional Organisations and Intervention in the Libyan and Syrian Civil Wars
Authors
Fung, CJ
Keywordsegional organisations
intervention
Libya
Syria
China
United Nations
Arab Spring
Issue Date2016
PublisherRoutledge. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/ctwq20
Citation
Third World Quarterly, 2016, v. 37 n. 1, p. 33-50 How to Cite?
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2015.1078230
AbstractWhy was China responsive to regional organisations’ call for intervention in the case of the Libya crisis, where it supported sanctions and an International Criminal Court referral, and acquiesced to a no-fly zone, but unresponsive to pressure from regional organisations for intervention in the Syria crisis, issuing repeated vetoes instead? Using interviews and other primary data, this article explains the variation by highlighting that China is most responsive to regional organisations when these groups remain cohesive, congregate around the same policy position and when they publicly criticise or isolate China.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/255093
ISSN
0143-6597
2023 Impact Factor: 1.9
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.810
ISI Accession Number ID
WOS:000370630900003

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorFung, CJ-
dc.date.accessioned2018-06-22T01:31:21Z-
dc.date.available2018-06-22T01:31:21Z-
dc.date.issued2016-
dc.identifier.citationThird World Quarterly, 2016, v. 37 n. 1, p. 33-50-
dc.identifier.issn0143-6597-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/255093-
dc.description.abstractWhy was China responsive to regional organisations’ call for intervention in the case of the Libya crisis, where it supported sanctions and an International Criminal Court referral, and acquiesced to a no-fly zone, but unresponsive to pressure from regional organisations for intervention in the Syria crisis, issuing repeated vetoes instead? Using interviews and other primary data, this article explains the variation by highlighting that China is most responsive to regional organisations when these groups remain cohesive, congregate around the same policy position and when they publicly criticise or isolate China.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherRoutledge. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/ctwq20-
dc.relation.ispartofThird World Quarterly-
dc.rightsPreprint: This is an Author's Original Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis Group in [JOURNAL TITLE] on [date of publication], available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/[Article DOI]. Postprint: This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis Group in [JOURNAL TITLE] on [date of publication], available online at: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/[Article DOI].-
dc.subjectegional organisations-
dc.subjectintervention-
dc.subjectLibya-
dc.subjectSyria-
dc.subjectChina-
dc.subjectUnited Nations-
dc.subjectArab Spring-
dc.titleGlobal South Solidarity? China, Regional Organisations and Intervention in the Libyan and Syrian Civil Wars-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.emailFung, CJ: cjfung@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.authorityFung, CJ=rp01785-
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/01436597.2015.1078230-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-84957845551-
dc.identifier.hkuros318066-
dc.identifier.volume37-
dc.identifier.issue1-
dc.identifier.spage33-
dc.identifier.epage50-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000370630900003-
dc.publisher.placeUnited Kingdom-
dc.identifier.issnl0143-6597-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats

OR

Export to Other Non-XML Formats