File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

Supplementary

Conference Paper: Reoperative Neck Dissection in Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma - When Is It Worth Doing?

TitleReoperative Neck Dissection in Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma - When Is It Worth Doing?
Authors
Issue Date2017
Citation
2017 Annual Meeting and 50th Anniversary of the Taiwan Surgical Association, Taipei, Taiwan, 18-19 March 2017 How to Cite?
AbstractThe surgical management of recurrent thyroid cancer poses distinct challenges from those of initial treatment. The risks associated with operating upon recurrent disease are typically higher and so, the goals and the extent of resection should be tailored to the specific clinical situation. Technical demands of reoperative neck dissection and the potential to alter the natural history of the disease both warrant consideration. As a result, the decision regarding surgical intervention versus active surveillance after detection of biopsy-proven recurrent or persistent tumor should not be taken lightly. Factors to be considered include whether the primary tumor belongs to an adverse histology, the rate of change of thyroglobulin levels, the rate of growth of imaged lymph nodes, as well as the presence of extranodal extension to the trachea, the esophagus, or carotid artery. Additional factors to be considered include the inability of the tumor to concentrate radioactive iodine or produce thyroglobulin, molecular markers for aggressive behavior, as well as age, presence of other sites of metastases (and their progression), and comorbidities. In the 2015 American Thyroid Association guidelines, it was recommended that therapeutic compartmental central and/or lateral neck dissection in a previously operated compartment, sparing uninvolved vital structures, should only be performed for patients with biopsy-proven persistent or recurrent disease for central neck nodes ≥8mm and lateral neck nodes ≥10mm in the smallest dimension that could be localized on anatomic imaging. However, our experience would suggest that these criteria might be too stringent and the size limit could be raised further without compromising the subsequent surgical morbidity from a reoperative neck dissection. Also in addition to surgery, there are now other less invasive, non-surgical options available in treating small-volume persistent or recurrent neck diseases. The aim of the talk is to address some of these issues regarding to reoperative neck dissection for papillary thyroid carcinoma.
DescriptionDistinguished Lecture
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/252771

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLang, HHB-
dc.date.accessioned2018-05-04T06:12:31Z-
dc.date.available2018-05-04T06:12:31Z-
dc.date.issued2017-
dc.identifier.citation2017 Annual Meeting and 50th Anniversary of the Taiwan Surgical Association, Taipei, Taiwan, 18-19 March 2017-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/252771-
dc.descriptionDistinguished Lecture-
dc.description.abstractThe surgical management of recurrent thyroid cancer poses distinct challenges from those of initial treatment. The risks associated with operating upon recurrent disease are typically higher and so, the goals and the extent of resection should be tailored to the specific clinical situation. Technical demands of reoperative neck dissection and the potential to alter the natural history of the disease both warrant consideration. As a result, the decision regarding surgical intervention versus active surveillance after detection of biopsy-proven recurrent or persistent tumor should not be taken lightly. Factors to be considered include whether the primary tumor belongs to an adverse histology, the rate of change of thyroglobulin levels, the rate of growth of imaged lymph nodes, as well as the presence of extranodal extension to the trachea, the esophagus, or carotid artery. Additional factors to be considered include the inability of the tumor to concentrate radioactive iodine or produce thyroglobulin, molecular markers for aggressive behavior, as well as age, presence of other sites of metastases (and their progression), and comorbidities. In the 2015 American Thyroid Association guidelines, it was recommended that therapeutic compartmental central and/or lateral neck dissection in a previously operated compartment, sparing uninvolved vital structures, should only be performed for patients with biopsy-proven persistent or recurrent disease for central neck nodes ≥8mm and lateral neck nodes ≥10mm in the smallest dimension that could be localized on anatomic imaging. However, our experience would suggest that these criteria might be too stringent and the size limit could be raised further without compromising the subsequent surgical morbidity from a reoperative neck dissection. Also in addition to surgery, there are now other less invasive, non-surgical options available in treating small-volume persistent or recurrent neck diseases. The aim of the talk is to address some of these issues regarding to reoperative neck dissection for papillary thyroid carcinoma.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofTaiwan Surgical Association Annual Meeting and 50th Anniversary, 2017-
dc.relation.ispartof台灣外科醫學會 2017(106)年度外科聯合學術演講會(TSA 五十週年)-
dc.titleReoperative Neck Dissection in Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma - When Is It Worth Doing?-
dc.typeConference_Paper-
dc.identifier.emailLang, HHB: blang@hkucc.hku.hk-
dc.identifier.authorityLang, HHB=rp01828-
dc.identifier.hkuros274669-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats