File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: North by Northeast: Toward an Asian-Arctic region

TitleNorth by Northeast: Toward an Asian-Arctic region
Authors
Keywordsshipping
regions
Northeast Asia
networks
governance
Arctic
Issue Date2014
Citation
Eurasian Geography and Economics, 2014, v. 55, n. 1, p. 71-93 How to Cite?
AbstractThough the Arctic Council accepted China, Japan, and South Korea as observers in May 2013, the multilateral organizations permanent member states continue to treat them as non-Arctic outsiders due to their lack of territory north of the Arctic Circle. Applying geographic perspectives that consider the importance of territory and proximity on the one hand and relations and networks on the other, the author argues for a reconceptualization of the Arctic region extending beyond the Arctic Circle. After presenting an overview of the Arctics long-standing economic integration with disparate parts of the globe, the author examines the bilateral economic cooperation occurring between countries in Northeast Asia and the eight countries with territory north of the Arctic Circle. Special attention is paid to the ports, or gateways and pivots, linking resources in the North Pacific and wider Arctic region to destinations in Northeast Asia. Importantly, the shipping lanes of the Northern Sea Route and the North Pacific Great Circle Route are facilitating these commercial ties, especially as northern countries seek to export their liquefied natural gas to expanding markets in Northeast Asia. Finally, as political cooperation has not grown to match the intensifying economic cooperation between Northeast Asian and Arctic countries, the author considers present and future directions of regional governance within the Asian-Arctic region. Possibilities examined include more focused regional and mini-lateral structures along with mechanisms based less on territory and more on networks and relations, especially those concentrated in the North Pacific-Northeast Asias maritime entryway to the Arctic. © 2014 Taylor and Francis.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/251268
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 1.7
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.065
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBennett, Mia M.-
dc.date.accessioned2018-02-01T01:55:04Z-
dc.date.available2018-02-01T01:55:04Z-
dc.date.issued2014-
dc.identifier.citationEurasian Geography and Economics, 2014, v. 55, n. 1, p. 71-93-
dc.identifier.issn1538-7216-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/251268-
dc.description.abstractThough the Arctic Council accepted China, Japan, and South Korea as observers in May 2013, the multilateral organizations permanent member states continue to treat them as non-Arctic outsiders due to their lack of territory north of the Arctic Circle. Applying geographic perspectives that consider the importance of territory and proximity on the one hand and relations and networks on the other, the author argues for a reconceptualization of the Arctic region extending beyond the Arctic Circle. After presenting an overview of the Arctics long-standing economic integration with disparate parts of the globe, the author examines the bilateral economic cooperation occurring between countries in Northeast Asia and the eight countries with territory north of the Arctic Circle. Special attention is paid to the ports, or gateways and pivots, linking resources in the North Pacific and wider Arctic region to destinations in Northeast Asia. Importantly, the shipping lanes of the Northern Sea Route and the North Pacific Great Circle Route are facilitating these commercial ties, especially as northern countries seek to export their liquefied natural gas to expanding markets in Northeast Asia. Finally, as political cooperation has not grown to match the intensifying economic cooperation between Northeast Asian and Arctic countries, the author considers present and future directions of regional governance within the Asian-Arctic region. Possibilities examined include more focused regional and mini-lateral structures along with mechanisms based less on territory and more on networks and relations, especially those concentrated in the North Pacific-Northeast Asias maritime entryway to the Arctic. © 2014 Taylor and Francis.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofEurasian Geography and Economics-
dc.subjectshipping-
dc.subjectregions-
dc.subjectNortheast Asia-
dc.subjectnetworks-
dc.subjectgovernance-
dc.subjectArctic-
dc.titleNorth by Northeast: Toward an Asian-Arctic region-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/15387216.2014.936480-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-84906226753-
dc.identifier.volume55-
dc.identifier.issue1-
dc.identifier.spage71-
dc.identifier.epage93-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000342287600004-
dc.identifier.issnl1538-7216-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats