File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1080/14650045.2015.1017757
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-84959858158
- WOS: WOS:000359600700008
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: How china sees the arctic: Reading between extraregional and intraregional narratives
Title | How china sees the arctic: Reading between extraregional and intraregional narratives |
---|---|
Authors | |
Issue Date | 2015 |
Citation | Geopolitics, 2015, v. 20, n. 3, p. 645-668 How to Cite? |
Abstract | © Taylor & Francis Group, LLC. In May 2013, China gained observer status in the Arctic Council, exemplifying its growing legitimacy as a regional actor in the eyes of the eight countries with territory north of the Arctic Circle. Yet since China remains an extraregional state without territory in the Arctic, Chinese officials continue to bolster their stateâs legitimacy as an Arctic stakeholder through two spatially inconsistent but mutually reinforcing grand regional narratives. On the one hand, Chinese officials recognize the salience of territory and presence in the Arctic, underscoring their countryâs ânear-Arcticâ location and polar scientific expeditions. On the other hand, officials depict the Arctic as a maritime, global space where climate change has potential ramifications for the entire planet. Significantly, these reframings are affecting intraregional statesâ perceptions of the Arctic, demonstrating how a regionâs territorial extent, symbolic meaning, and institutional form emerge through the ongoing conversation between extraregional and intraregional narratives. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/251147 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 3.0 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.211 |
ISI Accession Number ID |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Bennett, Mia M. | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2018-02-01T01:54:44Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2018-02-01T01:54:44Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2015 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Geopolitics, 2015, v. 20, n. 3, p. 645-668 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1465-0045 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/251147 | - |
dc.description.abstract | © Taylor & Francis Group, LLC. In May 2013, China gained observer status in the Arctic Council, exemplifying its growing legitimacy as a regional actor in the eyes of the eight countries with territory north of the Arctic Circle. Yet since China remains an extraregional state without territory in the Arctic, Chinese officials continue to bolster their stateâs legitimacy as an Arctic stakeholder through two spatially inconsistent but mutually reinforcing grand regional narratives. On the one hand, Chinese officials recognize the salience of territory and presence in the Arctic, underscoring their countryâs ânear-Arcticâ location and polar scientific expeditions. On the other hand, officials depict the Arctic as a maritime, global space where climate change has potential ramifications for the entire planet. Significantly, these reframings are affecting intraregional statesâ perceptions of the Arctic, demonstrating how a regionâs territorial extent, symbolic meaning, and institutional form emerge through the ongoing conversation between extraregional and intraregional narratives. | - |
dc.language | eng | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | Geopolitics | - |
dc.title | How china sees the arctic: Reading between extraregional and intraregional narratives | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1080/14650045.2015.1017757 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-84959858158 | - |
dc.identifier.volume | 20 | - |
dc.identifier.issue | 3 | - |
dc.identifier.spage | 645 | - |
dc.identifier.epage | 668 | - |
dc.identifier.eissn | 1557-3028 | - |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000359600700008 | - |
dc.identifier.issnl | 1465-0045 | - |