File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Judicial innovation and local politics: Judicialization of administrative governance in east China

TitleJudicial innovation and local politics: Judicialization of administrative governance in east China
Authors
Issue Date2013
Citation
China Journal, 2013, n. 69, p. 20-42 How to Cite?
AbstractDrawing on data from a mid-sized city in eastern China, this article examines interactions among the courts, the Party and other administrative agencies. It finds that, caught between unruly administrative agencies and legal rhetoric, the courts seek support from the Party to enhance their authority. They then devise tactics such as putting agencies' chief officials on the stand, issuing judicial suggestions and applying the laws in innovative ways. These are often effective, because agencies adjust their behaviors accordingly. Contrary to conventional wisdom that the courts are only a passive actor in local politics, their role in translating national laws into local practice is by no means negligible. By exploring the dynamics of court-government relations in the context of administrative litigation, this article argues that local politics is a crucial factor in determining the trajectory of China's judicialization of administrative governance, and rule of law more generally. Copyright 2013 by The Austalian National University. All Rights Reserved.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/251031
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 4.7
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.005
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHe, Xin-
dc.date.accessioned2018-02-01T01:54:23Z-
dc.date.available2018-02-01T01:54:23Z-
dc.date.issued2013-
dc.identifier.citationChina Journal, 2013, n. 69, p. 20-42-
dc.identifier.issn1324-9347-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/251031-
dc.description.abstractDrawing on data from a mid-sized city in eastern China, this article examines interactions among the courts, the Party and other administrative agencies. It finds that, caught between unruly administrative agencies and legal rhetoric, the courts seek support from the Party to enhance their authority. They then devise tactics such as putting agencies' chief officials on the stand, issuing judicial suggestions and applying the laws in innovative ways. These are often effective, because agencies adjust their behaviors accordingly. Contrary to conventional wisdom that the courts are only a passive actor in local politics, their role in translating national laws into local practice is by no means negligible. By exploring the dynamics of court-government relations in the context of administrative litigation, this article argues that local politics is a crucial factor in determining the trajectory of China's judicialization of administrative governance, and rule of law more generally. Copyright 2013 by The Austalian National University. All Rights Reserved.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofChina Journal-
dc.titleJudicial innovation and local politics: Judicialization of administrative governance in east China-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1086/668805-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-84876541130-
dc.identifier.issue69-
dc.identifier.spage20-
dc.identifier.epage42-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000315423400002-
dc.identifier.issnl1324-9347-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats