File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

Supplementary

Conference Paper: Contemplating Land: An Eco-critique of Three Hong Kong Documentaries

TitleContemplating Land: An Eco-critique of Three Hong Kong Documentaries
Authors
Issue Date2017
PublisherAssociation for Asian Studies (AAS)-in-Asia.
Citation
AAS-in-Asia Conference: Asia in Motion: Beyond Borders and Boundaries, Seoul, Korea, 24-27 June 2017 How to Cite?
AbstractIn The Cambridge Introduction to Literature and the Environment (2011), Timothy Clark argues that “ecologically, national borders have always been unreal” (132). One should start to cultivate ecocritical thinking beyond geographical, national, and cultural boundaries. In what ways does eco-cosmopolitanism enable us to cultivate ecocritical thinking that addresses environmental issues in various scales (local, national, transnational, global), while resisting the risk of reproducing the deep ecological cliché that everything on earth is simply connected as a global unity? By focusing on three Hong Kong documentaries, The Way of Paddy (2013), Open Road after Harvest (2015) and Kong Rice (2015) – which contemplate upon Hong Kong’s agricultural industry, rural-urban conflicts in the name of development, and the material significance and symbolic meaning of “leisure farming”, this paper explores the ideological conflicts between place attachment and eco-cosmopolitanism tendencies, rural and urban, individual and government, intellectual and the masses. To offer a post-urban perspective, this paper explores whether the phenomenon of “leisure farming” hints at a possibility of going beyond the boundary set between the rural and the urban? To phrase it in another way, would the “rural” turn in Hong Kong hints at a shift from urban to rural, and see rural not as a metaphoric or social construct but instead focus on soil’s material agency as a matter that “produce (helpful, harmful) effects in human and other bodies.“ (Bennett, 2010: xii).
DescriptionSession: Eco-criticism in Asian Narratives: A Reflection on Land, Disaster, Technology, and Ethics across Borders and Boundaries
Organizers: Association for Asian Studies (AAS) and the Research Institute of Korean Studies, Korea University
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/247189

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorYee, WLM-
dc.date.accessioned2017-10-18T08:23:41Z-
dc.date.available2017-10-18T08:23:41Z-
dc.date.issued2017-
dc.identifier.citationAAS-in-Asia Conference: Asia in Motion: Beyond Borders and Boundaries, Seoul, Korea, 24-27 June 2017-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/247189-
dc.descriptionSession: Eco-criticism in Asian Narratives: A Reflection on Land, Disaster, Technology, and Ethics across Borders and Boundaries-
dc.descriptionOrganizers: Association for Asian Studies (AAS) and the Research Institute of Korean Studies, Korea University-
dc.description.abstractIn The Cambridge Introduction to Literature and the Environment (2011), Timothy Clark argues that “ecologically, national borders have always been unreal” (132). One should start to cultivate ecocritical thinking beyond geographical, national, and cultural boundaries. In what ways does eco-cosmopolitanism enable us to cultivate ecocritical thinking that addresses environmental issues in various scales (local, national, transnational, global), while resisting the risk of reproducing the deep ecological cliché that everything on earth is simply connected as a global unity? By focusing on three Hong Kong documentaries, The Way of Paddy (2013), Open Road after Harvest (2015) and Kong Rice (2015) – which contemplate upon Hong Kong’s agricultural industry, rural-urban conflicts in the name of development, and the material significance and symbolic meaning of “leisure farming”, this paper explores the ideological conflicts between place attachment and eco-cosmopolitanism tendencies, rural and urban, individual and government, intellectual and the masses. To offer a post-urban perspective, this paper explores whether the phenomenon of “leisure farming” hints at a possibility of going beyond the boundary set between the rural and the urban? To phrase it in another way, would the “rural” turn in Hong Kong hints at a shift from urban to rural, and see rural not as a metaphoric or social construct but instead focus on soil’s material agency as a matter that “produce (helpful, harmful) effects in human and other bodies.“ (Bennett, 2010: xii).-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherAssociation for Asian Studies (AAS)-in-Asia.-
dc.relation.ispartofAAS-in-Asia Conference-
dc.titleContemplating Land: An Eco-critique of Three Hong Kong Documentaries-
dc.typeConference_Paper-
dc.identifier.emailYee, WLM: yeelmw@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.authorityYee, WLM=rp01401-
dc.identifier.hkuros279391-
dc.publisher.placeSeoul, Korea-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats