File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Conference Paper: Current role of liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma. Where are we?

TitleCurrent role of liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma. Where are we?
Authors
Issue Date2017
PublisherWiley. The Journal's web site is located at http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1868-6982
Citation
Joint Congress of The 6th Biennial Congress of the Asian-Pacific Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association (A-PHPBA) & The 29th Meeting of Japanese Society of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Yokohama, Japan, 7–10 June 2017. In Journal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Sciences, 2017, v. 24 n. S1, p. A28, abstract no. SY–5–2 How to Cite?
AbstractLiver transplantation (LT) is the only treatment of choice that offers cure for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and underlying liver cirrhosis. The success of LT for HCC depends very much on the patient selection, in which biological aggressiveness of tumor plays an important role. Deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT) and living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) are the two main approaches of LT worldwide. In DDLT, strict patient selection for LT should be adopted as the cadaveric liver graft is precious to both cirrhotic patients without HCC and those with HCC. Over the years, the Milan criteria is a reliable and easily applicable way to select out good–risk patients with early HCC for LT. To maximize the benefit of LT, extended criteria using serum tumor marker assay, positron emission tomography or tumor biopsy and the down–staging protocol can justify the application of LT for HCC patients without compromising survival. LDLT is an alternative way to pursue LT for HCC and is the main LT approach in Asia–Pacific region where cadaveric liver graft is scarce. High degree of flexibility in patient selection is allowed in LDLT, but the results might be compromised by the“fast–track”surgery and the potential small–for–size syndrome. Nonetheless, favorable results can be achieved in selected good–risk patients. Salvage transplantation following curative hepatectomy is another debatable approach. On the whole, the role of LT for HCC is evolving and selected good–risk patients with HCC can be benefited with good long–term survival outcome.
DescriptionSymposium Lecture
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/246859
ISSN
2021 Impact Factor: 3.149
2020 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.630

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorNg, KCK-
dc.date.accessioned2017-09-28T04:38:09Z-
dc.date.available2017-09-28T04:38:09Z-
dc.date.issued2017-
dc.identifier.citationJoint Congress of The 6th Biennial Congress of the Asian-Pacific Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association (A-PHPBA) & The 29th Meeting of Japanese Society of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Yokohama, Japan, 7–10 June 2017. In Journal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Sciences, 2017, v. 24 n. S1, p. A28, abstract no. SY–5–2-
dc.identifier.issn1868-6974-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/246859-
dc.descriptionSymposium Lecture-
dc.description.abstractLiver transplantation (LT) is the only treatment of choice that offers cure for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and underlying liver cirrhosis. The success of LT for HCC depends very much on the patient selection, in which biological aggressiveness of tumor plays an important role. Deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT) and living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) are the two main approaches of LT worldwide. In DDLT, strict patient selection for LT should be adopted as the cadaveric liver graft is precious to both cirrhotic patients without HCC and those with HCC. Over the years, the Milan criteria is a reliable and easily applicable way to select out good–risk patients with early HCC for LT. To maximize the benefit of LT, extended criteria using serum tumor marker assay, positron emission tomography or tumor biopsy and the down–staging protocol can justify the application of LT for HCC patients without compromising survival. LDLT is an alternative way to pursue LT for HCC and is the main LT approach in Asia–Pacific region where cadaveric liver graft is scarce. High degree of flexibility in patient selection is allowed in LDLT, but the results might be compromised by the“fast–track”surgery and the potential small–for–size syndrome. Nonetheless, favorable results can be achieved in selected good–risk patients. Salvage transplantation following curative hepatectomy is another debatable approach. On the whole, the role of LT for HCC is evolving and selected good–risk patients with HCC can be benefited with good long–term survival outcome.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherWiley. The Journal's web site is located at http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1868-6982-
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Sciences-
dc.titleCurrent role of liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma. Where are we?-
dc.typeConference_Paper-
dc.identifier.emailNg, KCK: kkcng@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/jhbp.474-
dc.identifier.hkuros275177-
dc.identifier.volume24-
dc.identifier.issueS1-
dc.identifier.spageA28, abstract no. SY–5–2-
dc.identifier.epageA28, abstract no. SY–5–2-
dc.publisher.placeJapan-
dc.identifier.issnl1868-6974-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats