File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1007/s11406-017-9840-1
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-85018289119
- WOS: WOS:000404241400023
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Actual vs. Counterfactual Dispositional Metasemantics: A Reply to Andow
Title | Actual vs. Counterfactual Dispositional Metasemantics: A Reply to Andow |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | Metasemantics Philosophy of language Dispositions |
Issue Date | 2017 |
Citation | Philosophia (United States), 2017, v. 45, n. 2, p. 717-734 How to Cite? |
Abstract | © 2017, Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht. In previous work (Johnson & Nado 2014) we proposed a sketch of a disposition-based metasemantictheory, which has recently been criticized by James Andow (2016). Andow claims, first, that our dispositionalmetasemantics threatens to render the meanings of our words indeterminate, and second, that our viewrisks a 'semantic apocalypse' according to which most of our terms fail to refer. We respond to Andow'scriticism by modifying and expanding our orignial, underspecified view. In particular, we propose that a viewthat appeals to actual dispositions rather than counterfactual dispositions avoids many difficulties that might confront a disposition-based metasemantics - issues even beyond those that Andow raises. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/244242 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 0.5 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.321 |
ISI Accession Number ID |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Johnson, Michael | - |
dc.contributor.author | Nado, Jennifer | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2017-08-31T08:56:26Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2017-08-31T08:56:26Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2017 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Philosophia (United States), 2017, v. 45, n. 2, p. 717-734 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0048-3893 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/244242 | - |
dc.description.abstract | © 2017, Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht. In previous work (Johnson & Nado 2014) we proposed a sketch of a disposition-based metasemantictheory, which has recently been criticized by James Andow (2016). Andow claims, first, that our dispositionalmetasemantics threatens to render the meanings of our words indeterminate, and second, that our viewrisks a 'semantic apocalypse' according to which most of our terms fail to refer. We respond to Andow'scriticism by modifying and expanding our orignial, underspecified view. In particular, we propose that a viewthat appeals to actual dispositions rather than counterfactual dispositions avoids many difficulties that might confront a disposition-based metasemantics - issues even beyond those that Andow raises. | - |
dc.language | eng | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | Philosophia (United States) | - |
dc.subject | Metasemantics | - |
dc.subject | Philosophy of language | - |
dc.subject | Dispositions | - |
dc.title | Actual vs. Counterfactual Dispositional Metasemantics: A Reply to Andow | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1007/s11406-017-9840-1 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-85018289119 | - |
dc.identifier.hkuros | 305866 | - |
dc.identifier.volume | 45 | - |
dc.identifier.issue | 2 | - |
dc.identifier.spage | 717 | - |
dc.identifier.epage | 734 | - |
dc.identifier.eissn | 1574-9274 | - |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000404241400023 | - |
dc.identifier.issnl | 0048-3893 | - |