File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1027/1864-9335/a000204
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-84923327140
- WOS: WOS:000341226100013
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Hunting for artifacts: The perils of dismissing inconsistent replication results
Title | Hunting for artifacts: The perils of dismissing inconsistent replication results |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | Replication Cleanliness Moral judgment Preregistration |
Issue Date | 2014 |
Citation | Social Psychology, 2014, v. 45, n. 4, p. 318-320 How to Cite? |
Abstract | We attempted high-powered direct replications of the two experiments in Schnall, Benton, and Harvey (2008) and did not duplicate the original results. We therefore concluded that more research was needed to establish the size and robustness of the original effects and to evaluate potential moderators. Schnall (2014) suggests that our conclusions were invalid because of potential psychometric artifacts in our data. We present evidence that undermines concerns about artifacts and defend the utility of preregistered replication studies for advancing research in psychological science. © 2014 Hogrefe Publishing. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/242691 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 1.2 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.668 |
ISI Accession Number ID |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Johnson, David J. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Cheung, Felix | - |
dc.contributor.author | Donnellan, M. Brent | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2017-08-10T10:51:20Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2017-08-10T10:51:20Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2014 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Social Psychology, 2014, v. 45, n. 4, p. 318-320 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1864-9335 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/242691 | - |
dc.description.abstract | We attempted high-powered direct replications of the two experiments in Schnall, Benton, and Harvey (2008) and did not duplicate the original results. We therefore concluded that more research was needed to establish the size and robustness of the original effects and to evaluate potential moderators. Schnall (2014) suggests that our conclusions were invalid because of potential psychometric artifacts in our data. We present evidence that undermines concerns about artifacts and defend the utility of preregistered replication studies for advancing research in psychological science. © 2014 Hogrefe Publishing. | - |
dc.language | eng | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | Social Psychology | - |
dc.subject | Replication | - |
dc.subject | Cleanliness | - |
dc.subject | Moral judgment | - |
dc.subject | Preregistration | - |
dc.title | Hunting for artifacts: The perils of dismissing inconsistent replication results | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1027/1864-9335/a000204 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-84923327140 | - |
dc.identifier.hkuros | 247949 | - |
dc.identifier.hkuros | 289100 | - |
dc.identifier.volume | 45 | - |
dc.identifier.issue | 4 | - |
dc.identifier.spage | 318 | - |
dc.identifier.epage | 320 | - |
dc.identifier.eissn | 2151-2590 | - |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000341226100013 | - |
dc.identifier.issnl | 1864-9335 | - |