File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Antibody response to a sub-potent influenza vaccine among nursing home residents and results of revaccination, New York, 1996-97

TitleAntibody response to a sub-potent influenza vaccine among nursing home residents and results of revaccination, New York, 1996-97
Authors
Issue Date1997
Citation
Clinical Infectious Diseases, 1997, v. 25, n. 2, p. 468 How to Cite?
AbstractBackground: In November 1996,11 lots of 1996-97 trivalent influenza vaccine were recalled because of decreasing potency of the A/Nanchang/933/95 (H3N2) component. Since higher antibody liters afford greater protection against influenza and because elderly persons are at high risk of influenza-related complications, we assessed the antibody titers of nursing home residents who received either recalled vaccine (RV) or non-RV. We then assessed the antibody response to revaccination among a subgroup of residents who had first received RV. Methods: We studied 86 residents from 3 nursing homes who received RV and 86 from 3 other nursing homes who received non-RV. Medical records were reviewed and blood samples were obtained 3 weeks after vaccination. Serum was tested by hemagglutination inhibition (HI) for antibody to all 3 components of the 1996-97 influenza vaccine. Sera collected from 23 residents from one nursing home before and 3 weeks after revaccination with normal potency vaccine were also tested by HI. Results: The geometric mean antibody titer (GMT) (33 vs. 55; p =0.01) and the percentage of residents with an antibody tiler >1:40 (52% vs. 67%; p = 0.04) to the A/Nanchang component were lower among residents who received RV than among residents who received non-RV. In the 23 residents assessed for response to revaccination, GMT to the A/Nanchang component increased from 24 to 39 (p=0.01) after revaccination. Conclusions: Residents who received RV had lower post-vaccination antibody titers to A/Nanchang than did those who received non-RV. Revaccination of residents who first received RV was associated with a rise in titer to the A/Nanchang component.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/238053
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 8.2
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 3.308

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBridges, C. B.-
dc.contributor.authorFukuda, K.-
dc.contributor.authorMontepiedra, A.-
dc.contributor.authorHolman, R. C.-
dc.contributor.authorGalligan, G.-
dc.contributor.authorGomolin, I. H.-
dc.contributor.authorLeib, H.-
dc.contributor.authorGallo, R.-
dc.contributor.authorRegnery, H.-
dc.contributor.authorArden, N.-
dc.contributor.authorCox, N.-
dc.date.accessioned2017-02-03T02:12:43Z-
dc.date.available2017-02-03T02:12:43Z-
dc.date.issued1997-
dc.identifier.citationClinical Infectious Diseases, 1997, v. 25, n. 2, p. 468-
dc.identifier.issn1058-4838-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/238053-
dc.description.abstractBackground: In November 1996,11 lots of 1996-97 trivalent influenza vaccine were recalled because of decreasing potency of the A/Nanchang/933/95 (H3N2) component. Since higher antibody liters afford greater protection against influenza and because elderly persons are at high risk of influenza-related complications, we assessed the antibody titers of nursing home residents who received either recalled vaccine (RV) or non-RV. We then assessed the antibody response to revaccination among a subgroup of residents who had first received RV. Methods: We studied 86 residents from 3 nursing homes who received RV and 86 from 3 other nursing homes who received non-RV. Medical records were reviewed and blood samples were obtained 3 weeks after vaccination. Serum was tested by hemagglutination inhibition (HI) for antibody to all 3 components of the 1996-97 influenza vaccine. Sera collected from 23 residents from one nursing home before and 3 weeks after revaccination with normal potency vaccine were also tested by HI. Results: The geometric mean antibody titer (GMT) (33 vs. 55; p =0.01) and the percentage of residents with an antibody tiler >1:40 (52% vs. 67%; p = 0.04) to the A/Nanchang component were lower among residents who received RV than among residents who received non-RV. In the 23 residents assessed for response to revaccination, GMT to the A/Nanchang component increased from 24 to 39 (p=0.01) after revaccination. Conclusions: Residents who received RV had lower post-vaccination antibody titers to A/Nanchang than did those who received non-RV. Revaccination of residents who first received RV was associated with a rise in titer to the A/Nanchang component.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofClinical Infectious Diseases-
dc.titleAntibody response to a sub-potent influenza vaccine among nursing home residents and results of revaccination, New York, 1996-97-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-33748179319-
dc.identifier.volume25-
dc.identifier.issue2-
dc.identifier.spage468-
dc.identifier.epage-
dc.identifier.issnl1058-4838-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats