File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Long-term stability of early implant placement with contour augmentation

TitleLong-term stability of early implant placement with contour augmentation
Authors
Keywordsdental implant
esthetic complication
esthetic outcome
single-tooth replacement
guided bone regeneration
post-extraction implant placement
Issue Date2013
Citation
Journal of Dental Research, 2013, v. 92, n. 12 How to Cite?
AbstractIn this prospective case series study, 20 patients with an implant-borne single crown following early implant placement with simultaneous contour augmentation were followed for 6 years. Clinical, radiologic, and esthetic parameters were assessed. In addition, cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) was used at 6 years to examine the facial bone wall. During the study period, all 20 implants were successfully integrated, and the clinical parameters remained stable over time. Pleasing esthetic outcomes were noted, as assessed by the pink esthetic scores. None of the implants developed mucosal recession of 1 mm or more. The periapical radiographs yielded stable peri-implant bone levels, with a mean DIB of 0.44 mm at 6 years. The CBCT scans showed that all 20 implants had a detectable facial bone wall at 6 years, with a mean thickness of around 1.9 mm. In summary, this prospective case series study demonstrated stable peri-implant hard and soft tissues for all 20 implants, and pleasing esthetic outcomes overall. The follow-up of 6 years confirmed that the risk for mucosal recession is low with early implant placement. In addition, contour augmentation with guided bone regeneration (GBR) was able to establish and maintain a facial bone wall in all 20 patients. © International & American Associations for Dental Research.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/236216
ISSN
2015 Impact Factor: 4.602
2015 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.714

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBuser, D.-
dc.contributor.authorChappuis, V.-
dc.contributor.authorKuchler, U.-
dc.contributor.authorBornstein, M. M.-
dc.contributor.authorWittneben, J. G.-
dc.contributor.authorBuser, R.-
dc.contributor.authorCavusoglu, Y.-
dc.contributor.authorBelser, U. C.-
dc.date.accessioned2016-11-11T07:43:15Z-
dc.date.available2016-11-11T07:43:15Z-
dc.date.issued2013-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Dental Research, 2013, v. 92, n. 12-
dc.identifier.issn0022-0345-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/236216-
dc.description.abstractIn this prospective case series study, 20 patients with an implant-borne single crown following early implant placement with simultaneous contour augmentation were followed for 6 years. Clinical, radiologic, and esthetic parameters were assessed. In addition, cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) was used at 6 years to examine the facial bone wall. During the study period, all 20 implants were successfully integrated, and the clinical parameters remained stable over time. Pleasing esthetic outcomes were noted, as assessed by the pink esthetic scores. None of the implants developed mucosal recession of 1 mm or more. The periapical radiographs yielded stable peri-implant bone levels, with a mean DIB of 0.44 mm at 6 years. The CBCT scans showed that all 20 implants had a detectable facial bone wall at 6 years, with a mean thickness of around 1.9 mm. In summary, this prospective case series study demonstrated stable peri-implant hard and soft tissues for all 20 implants, and pleasing esthetic outcomes overall. The follow-up of 6 years confirmed that the risk for mucosal recession is low with early implant placement. In addition, contour augmentation with guided bone regeneration (GBR) was able to establish and maintain a facial bone wall in all 20 patients. © International & American Associations for Dental Research.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Dental Research-
dc.subjectdental implant-
dc.subjectesthetic complication-
dc.subjectesthetic outcome-
dc.subjectsingle-tooth replacement-
dc.subjectguided bone regeneration-
dc.subjectpost-extraction implant placement-
dc.titleLong-term stability of early implant placement with contour augmentation-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.natureLink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/0022034513504949-
dc.identifier.pmid24158332-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-84887498202-
dc.identifier.volume92-
dc.identifier.issue12-
dc.identifier.spagenull-
dc.identifier.epagenull-
dc.identifier.eissn1544-0591-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats