File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Thickness of the anterior maxillary facial bone wall-a retrospective radiographic study using cone beam computed tomography.

TitleThickness of the anterior maxillary facial bone wall-a retrospective radiographic study using cone beam computed tomography.
Authors
Issue Date2011
Citation
The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry, 2011, v. 31, n. 2, p. 125-131 How to Cite?
AbstractThe purpose of this retrospective radiographic study was to analyze the thickness of the facial bone wall at teeth in the anterior maxilla based on cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) images, since this anatomical structure is important for the selection of an appropriate treatment approach in patients undergoing postextraction implant placement. A total of 125 CBCT scans met the inclusion criteria, resulting in a sample size of 498 teeth. The thickness of the facial bone wall in the respective sagittal scans was measured perpendicular to the long axis of the tooth at two locations: at the crest level (4 mm apical to the cementoenamel junction; MP1) and at the middle of the root (MP2). No existing bone wall was found in 25.7% of all teeth at MP1 and in 10.0% at MP2. The majority of the examined teeth exhibited a thin facial bone wall (< 1 mm; 62.9% at MP1, 80.1% at MP2). A thick bone wall ( 1 mm) was found in only 11.4% of all examined teeth at MP1 and 9.8% at MP2. There was a statistically significant decrease in facial bone wall thickness from the first premolars to the central incisors. The facial bone wall in the crestal area of teeth in the anterior maxilla was either missing or thin in roughly 90.0% of patients. Both a missing and thin facial wall require simultaneous contour augmentation at implant placement because of the well-documented bone resorption that occurs at a thin facial bone wall following tooth extraction. Consequently, radiographic analysis of the facial bone wall using CBCT prior to extraction is recommended for selection of the appropriate treatment approach.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/236176
ISSN
2015 Impact Factor: 1.039
2015 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.631

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBraut, Vedrana-
dc.contributor.authorBornstein, Michael M.-
dc.contributor.authorBelser, Urs-
dc.contributor.authorBuser, Daniel-
dc.date.accessioned2016-11-11T07:43:08Z-
dc.date.available2016-11-11T07:43:08Z-
dc.date.issued2011-
dc.identifier.citationThe International journal of periodontics &amp; restorative dentistry, 2011, v. 31, n. 2, p. 125-131-
dc.identifier.issn0198-7569-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/236176-
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of this retrospective radiographic study was to analyze the thickness of the facial bone wall at teeth in the anterior maxilla based on cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) images, since this anatomical structure is important for the selection of an appropriate treatment approach in patients undergoing postextraction implant placement. A total of 125 CBCT scans met the inclusion criteria, resulting in a sample size of 498 teeth. The thickness of the facial bone wall in the respective sagittal scans was measured perpendicular to the long axis of the tooth at two locations: at the crest level (4 mm apical to the cementoenamel junction; MP1) and at the middle of the root (MP2). No existing bone wall was found in 25.7% of all teeth at MP1 and in 10.0% at MP2. The majority of the examined teeth exhibited a thin facial bone wall (< 1 mm; 62.9% at MP1, 80.1% at MP2). A thick bone wall ( 1 mm) was found in only 11.4% of all examined teeth at MP1 and 9.8% at MP2. There was a statistically significant decrease in facial bone wall thickness from the first premolars to the central incisors. The facial bone wall in the crestal area of teeth in the anterior maxilla was either missing or thin in roughly 90.0% of patients. Both a missing and thin facial wall require simultaneous contour augmentation at implant placement because of the well-documented bone resorption that occurs at a thin facial bone wall following tooth extraction. Consequently, radiographic analysis of the facial bone wall using CBCT prior to extraction is recommended for selection of the appropriate treatment approach.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofThe International journal of periodontics &amp; restorative dentistry-
dc.titleThickness of the anterior maxillary facial bone wall-a retrospective radiographic study using cone beam computed tomography.-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.natureLink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.pmid21491011-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-79959681674-
dc.identifier.volume31-
dc.identifier.issue2-
dc.identifier.spage125-
dc.identifier.epage131-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats