File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Clinical concepts for regenerative therapy in intrabony defects

TitleClinical concepts for regenerative therapy in intrabony defects
Authors
Issue Date2015
Citation
Periodontology 2000, 2015, v. 68, n. 1, p. 282-307 How to Cite?
Abstract© 2015 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.Evidence indicates that periodontal regeneration is an efficacious and predictable procedure for the treatment of isolated and multiple intrabony defects. Meta-analyses from systematic reviews indicate an added benefit, in terms of clinical attachment level gain, when demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft, barrier membranes and active biologic products/compounds are applied in addition to open flap debridement. On the other hand, a consistent amount of variability of the outcomes is evident among different studies and within the experimental population of each study. This variability is explained, at least in part, by different patient and defect characteristics. Patient-related factors include smoking habit, compliance with home oral hygiene and residual inflammation after cause-related therapy. Defect-associated factors include defect depth and radiographic angle, the number of residual bony walls, pocket depth and the degree of hypermobility. In addition, surgical-related variables, such as surgical skill, clinical experience and knowledge, and application of the different regenerative materials, have a significant impact on clinical outcomes. This paper presents a strategy to optimize the clinical outcomes of periodontal regeneration. The surgical design of the flap, the use of different regenerative materials and the application of appropriate passive sutures are discussed in this review along with the scientific foundations.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/230984
ISSN
2015 Impact Factor: 4.949
2015 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.836

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCortellini, Pierpaolo-
dc.contributor.authorTonetti, Maurizio S.-
dc.date.accessioned2016-09-01T06:07:19Z-
dc.date.available2016-09-01T06:07:19Z-
dc.date.issued2015-
dc.identifier.citationPeriodontology 2000, 2015, v. 68, n. 1, p. 282-307-
dc.identifier.issn0906-6713-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/230984-
dc.description.abstract© 2015 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.Evidence indicates that periodontal regeneration is an efficacious and predictable procedure for the treatment of isolated and multiple intrabony defects. Meta-analyses from systematic reviews indicate an added benefit, in terms of clinical attachment level gain, when demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft, barrier membranes and active biologic products/compounds are applied in addition to open flap debridement. On the other hand, a consistent amount of variability of the outcomes is evident among different studies and within the experimental population of each study. This variability is explained, at least in part, by different patient and defect characteristics. Patient-related factors include smoking habit, compliance with home oral hygiene and residual inflammation after cause-related therapy. Defect-associated factors include defect depth and radiographic angle, the number of residual bony walls, pocket depth and the degree of hypermobility. In addition, surgical-related variables, such as surgical skill, clinical experience and knowledge, and application of the different regenerative materials, have a significant impact on clinical outcomes. This paper presents a strategy to optimize the clinical outcomes of periodontal regeneration. The surgical design of the flap, the use of different regenerative materials and the application of appropriate passive sutures are discussed in this review along with the scientific foundations.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofPeriodontology 2000-
dc.titleClinical concepts for regenerative therapy in intrabony defects-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.natureLink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/prd.12048-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-84927125492-
dc.identifier.volume68-
dc.identifier.issue1-
dc.identifier.spage282-
dc.identifier.epage307-
dc.identifier.eissn1600-0757-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats