File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Impact of complications of single tooth restorations on oral health-related quality of life

TitleImpact of complications of single tooth restorations on oral health-related quality of life
Authors
KeywordsSuccess
Fixed dental prostheses
Oral Health Impact Profile
Oral health-related quality of life
Patient satisfaction
Resin-bonded bridges
Single crowns
Survival
Failures
Dental implants
Complications
Bounded edentulous space
Issue Date2014
PublisherWiley-Blackwell Publishing, Inc.. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journals/CLR
Citation
Clinical Oral Implants Research, 2014, v. 25, n. 1, p. 67-73 How to Cite?
AbstractObjective: To compare oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) among subjects who received implant-supported crowns (ISC) and 2-unit cantilevered resin-bonded bridges (cRBB) in a bounded single tooth space (BSTS) after at least 5 years and to investigate factors associated with their OHRQoL. Methods: A case-control study among 78 subjects who received ISC or cRBB rehabilitation at a teaching hospital (39 ISCs and 39 cRBBs). OHRQoL was measured using the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-49) and compared between treatment modality. Variations in OHIP scores with respect to "minor complications" (repair of the original "survived" restorations) and "major complications" (replacement of "failed" restorations); and number of complications were determined in bivariate and multivariate analyses (negative binominal regression) controlling for socio-demographic and clinical factors. Results: Oral Health Impact Profile scores were similar among those who received ISC and cRBB (P = 0.53). Among subjects with complicated restorations, those with major complications reported significantly higher OHIP scores (poorer OHRQoL) than those with minor complications (P = 0.02). Subjects who experienced multiple complications had significantly higher OHIP scores (poorer OHRQoL) than those with a single complication (P = 0.04). In regression analyses (which considered OHIP scores of those with complications), the nature of complications (P < 0.01), treatment modality (P = 0.04), and gender (P = 0.02) emerged as significant factors. Conclusion: In the rehabilitation of a BSTS patients, OHRQoL was similar irrespective of treatment modality (ISC or cRBB). Among those who experienced complications their OHRQoL was associated with the nature of complications, treatment modality and gender. © 2013 John Wiley & Sons A/S.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/230946
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 4.8
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.865
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLam, Walter Y H-
dc.contributor.authorMcgrath, Colman P J-
dc.contributor.authorBotelho, Michael G.-
dc.date.accessioned2016-09-01T06:07:13Z-
dc.date.available2016-09-01T06:07:13Z-
dc.date.issued2014-
dc.identifier.citationClinical Oral Implants Research, 2014, v. 25, n. 1, p. 67-73-
dc.identifier.issn0905-7161-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/230946-
dc.description.abstractObjective: To compare oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) among subjects who received implant-supported crowns (ISC) and 2-unit cantilevered resin-bonded bridges (cRBB) in a bounded single tooth space (BSTS) after at least 5 years and to investigate factors associated with their OHRQoL. Methods: A case-control study among 78 subjects who received ISC or cRBB rehabilitation at a teaching hospital (39 ISCs and 39 cRBBs). OHRQoL was measured using the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-49) and compared between treatment modality. Variations in OHIP scores with respect to "minor complications" (repair of the original "survived" restorations) and "major complications" (replacement of "failed" restorations); and number of complications were determined in bivariate and multivariate analyses (negative binominal regression) controlling for socio-demographic and clinical factors. Results: Oral Health Impact Profile scores were similar among those who received ISC and cRBB (P = 0.53). Among subjects with complicated restorations, those with major complications reported significantly higher OHIP scores (poorer OHRQoL) than those with minor complications (P = 0.02). Subjects who experienced multiple complications had significantly higher OHIP scores (poorer OHRQoL) than those with a single complication (P = 0.04). In regression analyses (which considered OHIP scores of those with complications), the nature of complications (P < 0.01), treatment modality (P = 0.04), and gender (P = 0.02) emerged as significant factors. Conclusion: In the rehabilitation of a BSTS patients, OHRQoL was similar irrespective of treatment modality (ISC or cRBB). Among those who experienced complications their OHRQoL was associated with the nature of complications, treatment modality and gender. © 2013 John Wiley & Sons A/S.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherWiley-Blackwell Publishing, Inc.. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journals/CLR-
dc.relation.ispartofClinical Oral Implants Research-
dc.subjectSuccess-
dc.subjectFixed dental prostheses-
dc.subjectOral Health Impact Profile-
dc.subjectOral health-related quality of life-
dc.subjectPatient satisfaction-
dc.subjectResin-bonded bridges-
dc.subjectSingle crowns-
dc.subjectSurvival-
dc.subjectFailures-
dc.subjectDental implants-
dc.subjectComplications-
dc.subjectBounded edentulous space-
dc.titleImpact of complications of single tooth restorations on oral health-related quality of life-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/clr.12166-
dc.identifier.pmid23581287-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-84890793777-
dc.identifier.hkuros227334-
dc.identifier.hkuros224598-
dc.identifier.volume25-
dc.identifier.issue1-
dc.identifier.spage67-
dc.identifier.epage73-
dc.identifier.eissn1600-0501-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000328468800012-
dc.identifier.issnl0905-7161-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats