File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00488
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-84870914208
- WOS: WOS:000208864000197
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: A repeated lie becomes a truth? The effect of intentional control and training on deception
Title | A repeated lie becomes a truth? The effect of intentional control and training on deception |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | Automaticity Instruction Training Intentional control Deception Differentiation of deception paradigm |
Issue Date | 2012 |
Citation | Frontiers in Psychology, 2012, v. 3, n. NOV How to Cite? |
Abstract | Deception has been demonstrated as a task that involves executive control such as conflict monitoring and response inhibition. In the present study, we investigated whether or not the controlled processes associated with deception could be trained to be more efficient. Forty-eight participants finished a reaction time-based differentiation of deception paradigm (DDP) task using selfand other-referential information on two occasions. After the first baseline DDP task, participants were randomly assigned to one of three groups: a control group in which participants finished the same task for a second time; an instruction group in which participants were instructed to speed up their deceptive responses in the second DDP; a training group in which participants received training in speeding up their deceptive responses, and then proceeded to the second DDP. Results showed that instruction alone significantly reduced the RTs associated with participants' deceptive responses. However, the differences between deceptive and truthful responses were erased only in the training group. The result suggests that the performance associated with deception is malleable and could be voluntarily controlled with intention or training. © 2012 Hu, Chen and Fu. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/230912 |
ISI Accession Number ID |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Hu, Xiaoqing | - |
dc.contributor.author | Chen, Hao | - |
dc.contributor.author | Fu, Genyue | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2016-09-01T06:07:08Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2016-09-01T06:07:08Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2012 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Frontiers in Psychology, 2012, v. 3, n. NOV | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/230912 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Deception has been demonstrated as a task that involves executive control such as conflict monitoring and response inhibition. In the present study, we investigated whether or not the controlled processes associated with deception could be trained to be more efficient. Forty-eight participants finished a reaction time-based differentiation of deception paradigm (DDP) task using selfand other-referential information on two occasions. After the first baseline DDP task, participants were randomly assigned to one of three groups: a control group in which participants finished the same task for a second time; an instruction group in which participants were instructed to speed up their deceptive responses in the second DDP; a training group in which participants received training in speeding up their deceptive responses, and then proceeded to the second DDP. Results showed that instruction alone significantly reduced the RTs associated with participants' deceptive responses. However, the differences between deceptive and truthful responses were erased only in the training group. The result suggests that the performance associated with deception is malleable and could be voluntarily controlled with intention or training. © 2012 Hu, Chen and Fu. | - |
dc.language | eng | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | Frontiers in Psychology | - |
dc.subject | Automaticity | - |
dc.subject | Instruction | - |
dc.subject | Training | - |
dc.subject | Intentional control | - |
dc.subject | Deception | - |
dc.subject | Differentiation of deception paradigm | - |
dc.title | A repeated lie becomes a truth? The effect of intentional control and training on deception | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00488 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-84870914208 | - |
dc.identifier.volume | 3 | - |
dc.identifier.issue | NOV | - |
dc.identifier.spage | null | - |
dc.identifier.epage | null | - |
dc.identifier.eissn | 1664-1078 | - |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000208864000197 | - |
dc.identifier.issnl | 1664-1078 | - |