File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Long-term effects of supportive therapy in periodontal patients treated with fibre retention osseous resective surgery. II: Tooth extractions during active and supportive therapy

TitleLong-term effects of supportive therapy in periodontal patients treated with fibre retention osseous resective surgery. II: Tooth extractions during active and supportive therapy
Authors
KeywordsSupportive periodontal care
Periodontal therapy
Long-term effects
Tooth survival
Tooth loss
Issue Date2007
Citation
Journal of Clinical Periodontology, 2007, v. 34, n. 4, p. 342-348 How to Cite?
AbstractBackground: Long-term tooth retention is the main objective of periodontal treatment. The aim of this retrospective study was to describe the prevalence and reasons of tooth extraction during active periodontal therapy (APT) and supportive periodontal care (SPC) in periodontal patients. Material and Methods: Three hundred and four periodontal patients were examined. APT consisted of non-surgical periodontal treatment and fibre retention osseous resective surgery, where needed, to obtain no sites with PD> 3 mm. All patients participated in an SPC programme for 3-17 years (mean time 7.8 years). Results: At the initial examination, 45% of the patients had moderate periodontitis and 41% severe periodontitis. During APT, 576 teeth were extracted (7.5%). The main reason for tooth extraction during APT was the presence of advanced periodontal lesions (44%). The number of tooth extractions was higher in cases with severe periodontitis. Extracted teeth showed a mean bone loss of 76% of the total root length. During SPT, a total of 67 teeth were removed (0.9%) in a subgroup of 50 patients. The clinical problems were primarily related to the incidence of root fracture (48%) and secondarily to the progression of periodontal disease (30%). Conclusion: Prevalence of tooth extraction during APT is associated with the severity of periodontal disease. Tooth loss during supportive periodontal care may be negligible when a meticulous SPC programme is performed in patients where minimal probing depth is consequential to APT. © 2007 Blackwell Munksgaard.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/230775
ISSN
2015 Impact Factor: 3.915
2015 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.848

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCarnevale, Gianfranco-
dc.contributor.authorCairo, Francesco-
dc.contributor.authorTonetti, Maurizio S.-
dc.date.accessioned2016-09-01T06:06:46Z-
dc.date.available2016-09-01T06:06:46Z-
dc.date.issued2007-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Clinical Periodontology, 2007, v. 34, n. 4, p. 342-348-
dc.identifier.issn0303-6979-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/230775-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Long-term tooth retention is the main objective of periodontal treatment. The aim of this retrospective study was to describe the prevalence and reasons of tooth extraction during active periodontal therapy (APT) and supportive periodontal care (SPC) in periodontal patients. Material and Methods: Three hundred and four periodontal patients were examined. APT consisted of non-surgical periodontal treatment and fibre retention osseous resective surgery, where needed, to obtain no sites with PD> 3 mm. All patients participated in an SPC programme for 3-17 years (mean time 7.8 years). Results: At the initial examination, 45% of the patients had moderate periodontitis and 41% severe periodontitis. During APT, 576 teeth were extracted (7.5%). The main reason for tooth extraction during APT was the presence of advanced periodontal lesions (44%). The number of tooth extractions was higher in cases with severe periodontitis. Extracted teeth showed a mean bone loss of 76% of the total root length. During SPT, a total of 67 teeth were removed (0.9%) in a subgroup of 50 patients. The clinical problems were primarily related to the incidence of root fracture (48%) and secondarily to the progression of periodontal disease (30%). Conclusion: Prevalence of tooth extraction during APT is associated with the severity of periodontal disease. Tooth loss during supportive periodontal care may be negligible when a meticulous SPC programme is performed in patients where minimal probing depth is consequential to APT. © 2007 Blackwell Munksgaard.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Clinical Periodontology-
dc.subjectSupportive periodontal care-
dc.subjectPeriodontal therapy-
dc.subjectLong-term effects-
dc.subjectTooth survival-
dc.subjectTooth loss-
dc.titleLong-term effects of supportive therapy in periodontal patients treated with fibre retention osseous resective surgery. II: Tooth extractions during active and supportive therapy-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.natureLink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1600-051X.2007.01052.x-
dc.identifier.pmid17324156-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-33947304024-
dc.identifier.volume34-
dc.identifier.issue4-
dc.identifier.spage342-
dc.identifier.epage348-
dc.identifier.eissn1600-051X-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats