File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Kong Yunming manifest unreasonableness: The Doctrinal future of constitutional review of welfare policy in Hong Kong

TitleKong Yunming manifest unreasonableness: The Doctrinal future of constitutional review of welfare policy in Hong Kong
Authors
Issue Date2014
Citation
Hong Kong Law Journal, 2014, v. 44, p. 55-66 How to Cite?
AbstractIt would be easy to overstate the expansive impact of the Court of Final Appeal's controversial decision in Kong Yunming v Director of Social Welfare on the right to social welfare, its effects in removing a significant obstacle for new immigrants seeking social security payments notwithstanding. The new test that the Court deployed for reviewing the constitutionality of welfare policy is narrow and devoid of any commitment whatsoever to abstract societal ideals; it resembled the proportionality doctrine at most in form but definitely not in spirit. This article demonstrates how, properly understood, the three stages of this test boils down to no more than one stage: whether the impugned policy is manifestly unreasonable. This minimalist standard, in many ways similar to Wednesbury irrationality, evidences the Court's entrenchment of judicial deference in welfare policy adjudication and conservative economic philosophy in the constitutional common law of Hong Kong.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/228215
ISSN
2015 Impact Factor: 0.215
2015 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.101

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorIp, Eric C.-
dc.date.accessioned2016-08-01T06:45:28Z-
dc.date.available2016-08-01T06:45:28Z-
dc.date.issued2014-
dc.identifier.citationHong Kong Law Journal, 2014, v. 44, p. 55-66-
dc.identifier.issn0378-0600-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/228215-
dc.description.abstractIt would be easy to overstate the expansive impact of the Court of Final Appeal's controversial decision in Kong Yunming v Director of Social Welfare on the right to social welfare, its effects in removing a significant obstacle for new immigrants seeking social security payments notwithstanding. The new test that the Court deployed for reviewing the constitutionality of welfare policy is narrow and devoid of any commitment whatsoever to abstract societal ideals; it resembled the proportionality doctrine at most in form but definitely not in spirit. This article demonstrates how, properly understood, the three stages of this test boils down to no more than one stage: whether the impugned policy is manifestly unreasonable. This minimalist standard, in many ways similar to Wednesbury irrationality, evidences the Court's entrenchment of judicial deference in welfare policy adjudication and conservative economic philosophy in the constitutional common law of Hong Kong.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofHong Kong Law Journal-
dc.titleKong Yunming manifest unreasonableness: The Doctrinal future of constitutional review of welfare policy in Hong Kong-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.natureLink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-84926328898-
dc.identifier.volume44-
dc.identifier.spage55-
dc.identifier.epage66-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats