File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Measuring the impact of spatial network layout on community social cohesion: A cross-sectional study

TitleMeasuring the impact of spatial network layout on community social cohesion: A cross-sectional study
Authors
KeywordssDNA
Issue Date2014
Citation
International Journal of Health Geographics, 2014, v. 13 How to Cite?
AbstractBackground: There is now a substantial body of research suggesting that social cohesion, a collective characteristic measured by the levels of trust, reciprocity and formation of strong social bonds within communities, is an important factor in determining health. Of particular interest is the extent to which factors in the built environment facilitate, or impede, the development of social bonds. Severance is a characteristic of physical environments which is hypothesized to inhibit cohesion. In the current study we test a number of characteristics of spatial networks which could be hypothesized to relate either to severance, or directly to community cohesion. Particular focus is given to our most promising variable for further analysis (Convex Hull Maximum Radius 600 m).Methods: In the current study we analysed social cohesion as measured at Enumeration District level, aggregated from a survey of 10,892 individuals aged 18 to 74 years in the Caerphilly Health and Social Needs Cohort Study, 2001. In a data mining process we test 16 network variables on multiple scales. The variable showing the most promise is validated in a test on an independent data set. We then conduct a multivariate regression also including Townsend deprivation scores and urban/rural status as predictor variables for social cohesion.Results: We find convex hull maximum radius at a 600 m scale to have a small but highly significant correlation with social cohesion on both data sets. Deprivation has a stronger effect. Splitting the analysis by tertile of deprivation, we find that the effect of severance as measured by this variable is strongest in the most deprived areas. A range of spatial scales are tested, with the strongest effects being observed at scales that match typical walking distances.Conclusion: We conclude that physical connectivity as measured in this paper has a significant effect on social cohesion, and that our measure is unlikely to proxy either deprivation or the urban/rural status of communities. Possible mechanisms for the effect include intrinsic navigability of areas, and the existence of a focal route on which people can meet on foot. Further investigation may lead to much stronger predictive models of social cohesion. © 2014 Cooper et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/228188

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCooper, Crispin H V-
dc.contributor.authorFone, David L.-
dc.contributor.authorChiaradia, Alain J F-
dc.date.accessioned2016-08-01T06:45:24Z-
dc.date.available2016-08-01T06:45:24Z-
dc.date.issued2014-
dc.identifier.citationInternational Journal of Health Geographics, 2014, v. 13-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/228188-
dc.description.abstractBackground: There is now a substantial body of research suggesting that social cohesion, a collective characteristic measured by the levels of trust, reciprocity and formation of strong social bonds within communities, is an important factor in determining health. Of particular interest is the extent to which factors in the built environment facilitate, or impede, the development of social bonds. Severance is a characteristic of physical environments which is hypothesized to inhibit cohesion. In the current study we test a number of characteristics of spatial networks which could be hypothesized to relate either to severance, or directly to community cohesion. Particular focus is given to our most promising variable for further analysis (Convex Hull Maximum Radius 600 m).Methods: In the current study we analysed social cohesion as measured at Enumeration District level, aggregated from a survey of 10,892 individuals aged 18 to 74 years in the Caerphilly Health and Social Needs Cohort Study, 2001. In a data mining process we test 16 network variables on multiple scales. The variable showing the most promise is validated in a test on an independent data set. We then conduct a multivariate regression also including Townsend deprivation scores and urban/rural status as predictor variables for social cohesion.Results: We find convex hull maximum radius at a 600 m scale to have a small but highly significant correlation with social cohesion on both data sets. Deprivation has a stronger effect. Splitting the analysis by tertile of deprivation, we find that the effect of severance as measured by this variable is strongest in the most deprived areas. A range of spatial scales are tested, with the strongest effects being observed at scales that match typical walking distances.Conclusion: We conclude that physical connectivity as measured in this paper has a significant effect on social cohesion, and that our measure is unlikely to proxy either deprivation or the urban/rural status of communities. Possible mechanisms for the effect include intrinsic navigability of areas, and the existence of a focal route on which people can meet on foot. Further investigation may lead to much stronger predictive models of social cohesion. © 2014 Cooper et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Health Geographics-
dc.subjectsDNA-
dc.titleMeasuring the impact of spatial network layout on community social cohesion: A cross-sectional study-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.natureLink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/1476-072X-13-11-
dc.identifier.pmid24725759-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-84899474184-
dc.identifier.volume13-
dc.identifier.spagenull-
dc.identifier.epagenull-
dc.identifier.eissn1476-072X-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats