File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Contrasting single-trial ERPs between experimental manipulations: Improving differentiability by blind source separation

TitleContrasting single-trial ERPs between experimental manipulations: Improving differentiability by blind source separation
Authors
KeywordsBlind source separation (BSS)
Issue Date2006
Citation
NeuroImage, 2006, v. 29, n. 1, p. 335-346 How to Cite?
AbstractContrasting event-related potentials (ERPs) generated under different experimental conditions and inferring differential brain responses is widely practiced in cognitive neuroscience research. Traditionally, these contrasts and subsequent inferences have proceeded directly from ERPs measured at the scalp. For certain tasks, it is not unusual that ERPs from a subset of channels are given particular emphasis in data analysis, such as the channels displaying the maximum peak amplitude in regions of interest ("best sensors") or channels showing the largest averaged ERP waveform differences. With the aid of a blind source separation (BSS) algorithm, second-order blind identification (SOBI), which has been recently validated for its ability to recover correlated neuronal sources, we show that single-trial ERPs from previously validated neuronal sources were more distinguishable among different experimental manipulations than the single-trial ERPs measured at the comparable "best sensors". This suggests that by using validated SOBI-recovered neuronal sources, ERP researchers can improve the ability to detect differences in neuronal responses induced by experimental manipulations. Critically, our observations were made at the level of single trials, as opposed to the averaged ERP. Therefore, our conclusions are particularly relevant to phenomena involving trial-to-trial changes in brain activation, for example, rapid induction of brain plasticity and perceptual learning, as well as to the development of brain-computer interfaces. Similar advantages would also apply to analogous situations with magnetoencephalography (MEG). © 2005 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/228035
ISSN
2015 Impact Factor: 5.463
2015 SCImago Journal Rankings: 4.464

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorTang, Akaysha C.-
dc.contributor.authorSutherland, Matthew T.-
dc.contributor.authorWang, Yan-
dc.date.accessioned2016-08-01T06:45:01Z-
dc.date.available2016-08-01T06:45:01Z-
dc.date.issued2006-
dc.identifier.citationNeuroImage, 2006, v. 29, n. 1, p. 335-346-
dc.identifier.issn1053-8119-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/228035-
dc.description.abstractContrasting event-related potentials (ERPs) generated under different experimental conditions and inferring differential brain responses is widely practiced in cognitive neuroscience research. Traditionally, these contrasts and subsequent inferences have proceeded directly from ERPs measured at the scalp. For certain tasks, it is not unusual that ERPs from a subset of channels are given particular emphasis in data analysis, such as the channels displaying the maximum peak amplitude in regions of interest ("best sensors") or channels showing the largest averaged ERP waveform differences. With the aid of a blind source separation (BSS) algorithm, second-order blind identification (SOBI), which has been recently validated for its ability to recover correlated neuronal sources, we show that single-trial ERPs from previously validated neuronal sources were more distinguishable among different experimental manipulations than the single-trial ERPs measured at the comparable "best sensors". This suggests that by using validated SOBI-recovered neuronal sources, ERP researchers can improve the ability to detect differences in neuronal responses induced by experimental manipulations. Critically, our observations were made at the level of single trials, as opposed to the averaged ERP. Therefore, our conclusions are particularly relevant to phenomena involving trial-to-trial changes in brain activation, for example, rapid induction of brain plasticity and perceptual learning, as well as to the development of brain-computer interfaces. Similar advantages would also apply to analogous situations with magnetoencephalography (MEG). © 2005 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofNeuroImage-
dc.subjectBlind source separation (BSS)-
dc.titleContrasting single-trial ERPs between experimental manipulations: Improving differentiability by blind source separation-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.natureLink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.07.058-
dc.identifier.pmid16256373-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-29244473828-
dc.identifier.volume29-
dc.identifier.issue1-
dc.identifier.spage335-
dc.identifier.epage346-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats