File Download
  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Going Local: A Defense of Methodological Localism about Scientific Realism

TitleGoing Local: A Defense of Methodological Localism about Scientific Realism
Authors
Issue Date2016
PublisherSpringer Verlag Dordrecht. The Journal's web site is located at http://springerlink.metapress.com/openurl.asp?genre=journal&issn=0039-7857
Citation
Synthese, 2016 How to Cite?
AbstractScientific realism and anti-realism are most frequently discussed as global theses: theses that apply equally well across the board to all the various sciences. Against this status quo I defend the localist alternative, a methodological stance on scientific realism that approaches debates on realism at the level of individual sciences, rather than at science itself. After identifying the localist view, I provide a number of arguments in its defense, drawing on the diversity and disunity found in the sciences, as well as problems with other approaches (such as basing realism debates on the aim of science). I also show how the view is already at work, explicitly or implicitly, in the work of several philosophers of science. After meeting the objections that localism collapses either into globalism or hyperlocalism, I conclude by sketching what sorts of impacts localism can have in the philosophy of science.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/227695
ISSN
2015 Impact Factor: 0.723
2015 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.703

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAsay, JF-
dc.date.accessioned2016-07-18T09:12:18Z-
dc.date.available2016-07-18T09:12:18Z-
dc.date.issued2016-
dc.identifier.citationSynthese, 2016-
dc.identifier.issn0039-7857-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/227695-
dc.description.abstractScientific realism and anti-realism are most frequently discussed as global theses: theses that apply equally well across the board to all the various sciences. Against this status quo I defend the localist alternative, a methodological stance on scientific realism that approaches debates on realism at the level of individual sciences, rather than at science itself. After identifying the localist view, I provide a number of arguments in its defense, drawing on the diversity and disunity found in the sciences, as well as problems with other approaches (such as basing realism debates on the aim of science). I also show how the view is already at work, explicitly or implicitly, in the work of several philosophers of science. After meeting the objections that localism collapses either into globalism or hyperlocalism, I conclude by sketching what sorts of impacts localism can have in the philosophy of science.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherSpringer Verlag Dordrecht. The Journal's web site is located at http://springerlink.metapress.com/openurl.asp?genre=journal&issn=0039-7857-
dc.relation.ispartofSynthese-
dc.rightsThe final publication is available at Springer via http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11229-016-1072-6-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License-
dc.titleGoing Local: A Defense of Methodological Localism about Scientific Realism-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.emailAsay, JF: asay@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.authorityAsay, JF=rp01955-
dc.description.naturepostprint-
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s11229-016-1072-6-
dc.identifier.hkuros259839-
dc.publisher.placeNetherlands-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats