File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: A cluster randomized controlled trial of an incentive-based outdoor physical activity program

TitleA cluster randomized controlled trial of an incentive-based outdoor physical activity program
Authors
Issue Date2013
Citation
Journal of Pediatrics, 2013, v. 163, n. 1, p. 167-172.e1 How to Cite?
AbstractObjective: To evaluate an incentive-based physical activity intervention to increase physical activity and fitness among children in a 9-month cluster randomized controlled trial. Study design: Children aged 6-12 years were randomized to control (n = 138 from 106 families) or intervention arm (n = 147 from 106 families). The intervention included incentives for meeting step targets as measured by pedometers and structured weekend outdoor activities. Outcomes included trends in activity for the intervention group and between-group differences in pedometer steps, 6-minute walk test, body mass index, and parent-reported Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory. Results: At follow-up, children in the intervention group recorded significantly more pedometer steps than controls over the entire week (8660 vs 7767; P =.010), on weekdays (8646 vs 7826; P =.041), and on weekends (8779 vs 7684; P =.018). Three different trajectory classes were identified. The first group increased activity but was not sustained, the second group met the target step levels, and the third group significantly surpassed the step goals. The intervention group showed trends toward longer 6-minute walk test times and higher Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory scores, but the differences were not statistically significant. Conclusion: Incentives for increased step activity were effective in producing greater steps and showed a (nonsignificant) trend toward improvements in other health outcomes. Thus, future incentive trials should be incorporate greater step targets and longer follow-up periods to provide evidence of the long-term effect of these incentives on children's health. © 2013 Mosby Inc. All rights reserved.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/220874
ISSN
2015 Impact Factor: 3.89
2015 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.849

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorFinkelstein, Eric A.-
dc.contributor.authorTan, Yock Theng-
dc.contributor.authorMalhotra, Rahul-
dc.contributor.authorLee, Chun Fan-
dc.contributor.authorGoh, Shao Sheng-
dc.contributor.authorSaw, Seang Mei-
dc.date.accessioned2015-10-22T09:04:40Z-
dc.date.available2015-10-22T09:04:40Z-
dc.date.issued2013-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Pediatrics, 2013, v. 163, n. 1, p. 167-172.e1-
dc.identifier.issn0022-3476-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/220874-
dc.description.abstractObjective: To evaluate an incentive-based physical activity intervention to increase physical activity and fitness among children in a 9-month cluster randomized controlled trial. Study design: Children aged 6-12 years were randomized to control (n = 138 from 106 families) or intervention arm (n = 147 from 106 families). The intervention included incentives for meeting step targets as measured by pedometers and structured weekend outdoor activities. Outcomes included trends in activity for the intervention group and between-group differences in pedometer steps, 6-minute walk test, body mass index, and parent-reported Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory. Results: At follow-up, children in the intervention group recorded significantly more pedometer steps than controls over the entire week (8660 vs 7767; P =.010), on weekdays (8646 vs 7826; P =.041), and on weekends (8779 vs 7684; P =.018). Three different trajectory classes were identified. The first group increased activity but was not sustained, the second group met the target step levels, and the third group significantly surpassed the step goals. The intervention group showed trends toward longer 6-minute walk test times and higher Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory scores, but the differences were not statistically significant. Conclusion: Incentives for increased step activity were effective in producing greater steps and showed a (nonsignificant) trend toward improvements in other health outcomes. Thus, future incentive trials should be incorporate greater step targets and longer follow-up periods to provide evidence of the long-term effect of these incentives on children's health. © 2013 Mosby Inc. All rights reserved.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Pediatrics-
dc.titleA cluster randomized controlled trial of an incentive-based outdoor physical activity program-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.natureLink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jpeds.2013.01.009-
dc.identifier.pmid23415616-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-84879421342-
dc.identifier.volume163-
dc.identifier.issue1-
dc.identifier.spage167-
dc.identifier.epage172.e1-
dc.identifier.eissn1097-6833-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats