File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Self-determined motivation in sport predicts anti-doping motivation and intention: A perspective from the trans-contextual model

TitleSelf-determined motivation in sport predicts anti-doping motivation and intention: A perspective from the trans-contextual model
Authors
KeywordsTheory of planned behavior
Doping avoidance
Self-determination theory
Theoretical integration
Trans-contextual process
Issue Date2015
Citation
Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, 2015, v. 18, n. 3, p. 315-322 How to Cite?
Abstract© 2014 Sports Medicine Australia. Objectives: Motivation in sport has been frequently identified as a key factor of young athletes' intention of doping in sport, but there has not been any attempt in scrutinizing the motivational mechanism involved. The present study applied the trans-contextual model of motivation to explain the relationship between motivation in a sport context and motivation and the social-cognitive factors (attitude, subjective norm, perceived behavioral control, and intention) from the theory of planned behavior (TPB) in an anti-doping context. Design: A cross-sectional survey was conducted. Methods: Questionnaire data was collected from 410 elite and sub-elite young athletes in Australia (Mean age [17.7. ±. 3.9. yr], 55.4% male, Years in sport [9.1. ±. 3.2]). We measured the key model variables of study in relation to sport motivation (Behavioral Regulation in Sport Questionnaire), and the motivation (adapted version of the Treatment Self-Regulation Questionnaire) and social cognitive patterns (the theory of planned behavior questionnaire) of doping avoidance. The data was analyzed by variance-based structural equation modeling with bootstrapping of 999 replications. Results: The goodness-of-fit of the hypothesized model was acceptable. The bootstrapped parameter estimates revealed that autonomous motivation and amotivation in sport were positively associated with the corresponding types of motivation for the avoidance of doping. Autonomous motivation, subjective norm, and perceived behavioral control in doping avoidance fully mediated the relationship between autonomous motivation in sport and intention for doping avoidance. Conclusions: The findings support the tenets of the trans-contextual model, and explain how motivation in sport is related to athletes' motivation and intention with respect to anti-doping behaviors.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/214062
ISSN
2015 Impact Factor: 3.756
2015 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.484
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorChan, DKC-
dc.contributor.authorDimmock, JA-
dc.contributor.authorDonovan, RJ-
dc.contributor.authorHardcastle, S-
dc.contributor.authorLentillon-Kaestner, V-
dc.contributor.authorHagger, MS-
dc.date.accessioned2015-08-19T13:41:43Z-
dc.date.available2015-08-19T13:41:43Z-
dc.date.issued2015-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Science and Medicine in Sport, 2015, v. 18, n. 3, p. 315-322-
dc.identifier.issn1440-2440-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/214062-
dc.description.abstract© 2014 Sports Medicine Australia. Objectives: Motivation in sport has been frequently identified as a key factor of young athletes' intention of doping in sport, but there has not been any attempt in scrutinizing the motivational mechanism involved. The present study applied the trans-contextual model of motivation to explain the relationship between motivation in a sport context and motivation and the social-cognitive factors (attitude, subjective norm, perceived behavioral control, and intention) from the theory of planned behavior (TPB) in an anti-doping context. Design: A cross-sectional survey was conducted. Methods: Questionnaire data was collected from 410 elite and sub-elite young athletes in Australia (Mean age [17.7. ±. 3.9. yr], 55.4% male, Years in sport [9.1. ±. 3.2]). We measured the key model variables of study in relation to sport motivation (Behavioral Regulation in Sport Questionnaire), and the motivation (adapted version of the Treatment Self-Regulation Questionnaire) and social cognitive patterns (the theory of planned behavior questionnaire) of doping avoidance. The data was analyzed by variance-based structural equation modeling with bootstrapping of 999 replications. Results: The goodness-of-fit of the hypothesized model was acceptable. The bootstrapped parameter estimates revealed that autonomous motivation and amotivation in sport were positively associated with the corresponding types of motivation for the avoidance of doping. Autonomous motivation, subjective norm, and perceived behavioral control in doping avoidance fully mediated the relationship between autonomous motivation in sport and intention for doping avoidance. Conclusions: The findings support the tenets of the trans-contextual model, and explain how motivation in sport is related to athletes' motivation and intention with respect to anti-doping behaviors.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Science and Medicine in Sport-
dc.subjectTheory of planned behavior-
dc.subjectDoping avoidance-
dc.subjectSelf-determination theory-
dc.subjectTheoretical integration-
dc.subjectTrans-contextual process-
dc.titleSelf-determined motivation in sport predicts anti-doping motivation and intention: A perspective from the trans-contextual model-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.natureLink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jsams.2014.04.001-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-84925953844-
dc.identifier.volume18-
dc.identifier.issue3-
dc.identifier.spage315-
dc.identifier.epage322-
dc.identifier.eissn1878-1861-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000354008200016-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats