File Download
Supplementary

Conference Paper: Cognitive Contact Linguistics as an essential ingredient of diachronic construction grammar

TitleCognitive Contact Linguistics as an essential ingredient of diachronic construction grammar
Authors
Issue Date2015
Citation
The 13th International Cognitive Linguistics Conference (ICLC-13), Northumbria University, Newcastle, UK., 20-25 July 2015. How to Cite?
AbstractBACKGROUND: “Diachronic construction grammar” is a field of investigation that brings together two, still relatively young, research traditions, which one could characterize as historical construction grammar and constructionist grammaticalization theory (Noël 2013). Both traditions deal with the (phylogenetic) development of “constructicons”, i.e. with evolutions in the constructional resources of languages, but they have come to this research focus from different angles, the latter being the result of a constructionist turn in grammaticalization theoretical thinking, while the former has launched off from synchronic constructionist linguistics, comprising work on schematization, “diachronic constructional semasiology” (Colleman & De Clerck 2011), “constructional attrition” (Colleman & Noël 2012) as well …
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/213581

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorNoel, D-
dc.date.accessioned2015-08-06T04:09:34Z-
dc.date.available2015-08-06T04:09:34Z-
dc.date.issued2015-
dc.identifier.citationThe 13th International Cognitive Linguistics Conference (ICLC-13), Northumbria University, Newcastle, UK., 20-25 July 2015.-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/213581-
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: “Diachronic construction grammar” is a field of investigation that brings together two, still relatively young, research traditions, which one could characterize as historical construction grammar and constructionist grammaticalization theory (Noël 2013). Both traditions deal with the (phylogenetic) development of “constructicons”, i.e. with evolutions in the constructional resources of languages, but they have come to this research focus from different angles, the latter being the result of a constructionist turn in grammaticalization theoretical thinking, while the former has launched off from synchronic constructionist linguistics, comprising work on schematization, “diachronic constructional semasiology” (Colleman & De Clerck 2011), “constructional attrition” (Colleman & Noël 2012) as well …-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Cognitive Linguistics Conference, ICLC-13-
dc.rightsCreative Commons: Attribution 3.0 Hong Kong License-
dc.titleCognitive Contact Linguistics as an essential ingredient of diachronic construction grammar-
dc.typeConference_Paper-
dc.identifier.emailNoel, D: dnoel@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.authorityNoel, D=rp01170-
dc.description.naturepostprint-
dc.identifier.hkuros246928-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats