File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Academic freedom and university autonomy: A higher education policy perspective

TitleAcademic freedom and university autonomy: A higher education policy perspective
Authors
KeywordsHigher education policy
Higher education in China
Academic freedom
University autonomy
Intellectual freedom
Issue Date2013
Citation
Higher Education Policy, 2013, v. 26, n. 4, p. 507-522 How to Cite?
AbstractThis article reflects upon three seminal articles published in Higher Education Policy (HEP) on academic freedom and university autonomy. The reflections indicate that HEP research contributes to a sophisticated and systematic understanding of the complexity of academic freedom, addressing both the original theoretical issues and burning current issues in policy and practice, as well as in legislation. In particular, HEP has gone beyond academic circles and reached a broad readership, making a real difference to policy development to safeguard academic freedom. For broader comparative reflection, an epistemological dimension has been added to the HEP understanding and analysis of the concept of academic freedom. © 2013 International Association of Universities.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/210583
ISSN
2015 Impact Factor: 0.577
2015 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.681

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorRen, Kai-
dc.contributor.authorLi, Jun-
dc.date.accessioned2015-06-19T01:49:27Z-
dc.date.available2015-06-19T01:49:27Z-
dc.date.issued2013-
dc.identifier.citationHigher Education Policy, 2013, v. 26, n. 4, p. 507-522-
dc.identifier.issn0952-8733-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/210583-
dc.description.abstractThis article reflects upon three seminal articles published in Higher Education Policy (HEP) on academic freedom and university autonomy. The reflections indicate that HEP research contributes to a sophisticated and systematic understanding of the complexity of academic freedom, addressing both the original theoretical issues and burning current issues in policy and practice, as well as in legislation. In particular, HEP has gone beyond academic circles and reached a broad readership, making a real difference to policy development to safeguard academic freedom. For broader comparative reflection, an epistemological dimension has been added to the HEP understanding and analysis of the concept of academic freedom. © 2013 International Association of Universities.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofHigher Education Policy-
dc.subjectHigher education policy-
dc.subjectHigher education in China-
dc.subjectAcademic freedom-
dc.subjectUniversity autonomy-
dc.subjectIntellectual freedom-
dc.titleAcademic freedom and university autonomy: A higher education policy perspective-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.natureLink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1057/hep.2013.31-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-84887569780-
dc.identifier.hkuros262508-
dc.identifier.volume26-
dc.identifier.issue4-
dc.identifier.spage507-
dc.identifier.epage522-
dc.identifier.eissn1740-3863-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats