File Download
  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
  • Find via Find It@HKUL
Supplementary

Article: The Yet-to-Be Effective But Effective Tax: Hong Kong's Buyer's Stamp Duty as a Critical Case Study of Legislation by Press Release

TitleThe Yet-to-Be Effective But Effective Tax: Hong Kong's Buyer's Stamp Duty as a Critical Case Study of Legislation by Press Release
Authors
KeywordsStamp Duty
Legislation by Press Release
Retrospective
Retroactive
Politic
Issue Date2015
PublisherUniversity of Pennsylvania Law School. The Journal's web site is located at http://scholarship.law.upenn.edu/ealr/
Citation
University of Pennsylvania East Asia Law Review, 2015, v. 10 n. 1, p. 1-64 How to Cite?
AbstractWhen a government announces that an existing law will be amended and that the amendment, when finally enacted by the legislature, will be made effective from the announcement date, it is natural and inevitable that private entities will conduct their activities on the basis of the amended law immediately upon the announcement date, notwithstanding the announcement’s lack of any formal legal effect. This practice of effecting immediate de facto legal changes is known derisively, but perhaps aptly, as “legislation by press release.” This Article utilizes the recent use of legislation by press release to implement the Buyer’s Stamp Duty in Hong Kong as a case study to critically examine the legality and normative considerations of this increasingly common but under-theorized practice. Legally, this Article argues that the prospective notice provided by the initial announcement ensures the practice’s legality in all but an explicit prohibition of retrospective civil legislation. Normatively, this Article highlights the various criteria of clarity, consistency, necessity and political dynamic that affect the desirability of the practice. On a broader note, the formal retrospectivity inherent in the practice - but which does not disrupt the reliance interests of private entities - provides a useful reexamination of the conventional aversion towards retrospective laws.
DescriptionUniversity of Hong Kong Faculty of Law Research Paper No. 2015/010
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/209723
ISSN
SSRN

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorChen, J-
dc.date.accessioned2015-05-14T02:07:09Z-
dc.date.available2015-05-14T02:07:09Z-
dc.date.issued2015-
dc.identifier.citationUniversity of Pennsylvania East Asia Law Review, 2015, v. 10 n. 1, p. 1-64-
dc.identifier.issn1943-8249-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/209723-
dc.descriptionUniversity of Hong Kong Faculty of Law Research Paper No. 2015/010-
dc.description.abstractWhen a government announces that an existing law will be amended and that the amendment, when finally enacted by the legislature, will be made effective from the announcement date, it is natural and inevitable that private entities will conduct their activities on the basis of the amended law immediately upon the announcement date, notwithstanding the announcement’s lack of any formal legal effect. This practice of effecting immediate de facto legal changes is known derisively, but perhaps aptly, as “legislation by press release.” This Article utilizes the recent use of legislation by press release to implement the Buyer’s Stamp Duty in Hong Kong as a case study to critically examine the legality and normative considerations of this increasingly common but under-theorized practice. Legally, this Article argues that the prospective notice provided by the initial announcement ensures the practice’s legality in all but an explicit prohibition of retrospective civil legislation. Normatively, this Article highlights the various criteria of clarity, consistency, necessity and political dynamic that affect the desirability of the practice. On a broader note, the formal retrospectivity inherent in the practice - but which does not disrupt the reliance interests of private entities - provides a useful reexamination of the conventional aversion towards retrospective laws.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherUniversity of Pennsylvania Law School. The Journal's web site is located at http://scholarship.law.upenn.edu/ealr/-
dc.relation.ispartofUniversity of Pennsylvania East Asia Law Review-
dc.rightsCreative Commons: Attribution 3.0 Hong Kong License-
dc.subjectStamp Duty-
dc.subjectLegislation by Press Release-
dc.subjectRetrospective-
dc.subjectRetroactive-
dc.subjectPolitic-
dc.titleThe Yet-to-Be Effective But Effective Tax: Hong Kong's Buyer's Stamp Duty as a Critical Case Study of Legislation by Press Release-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.emailChen, J: jianlin@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.authorityChen, J=rp01530-
dc.description.naturepostprint-
dc.identifier.hkuros246826-
dc.identifier.volume10-
dc.identifier.spage1-
dc.identifier.epage64-
dc.publisher.placeUnited States-
dc.identifier.ssrn2592671-
dc.identifier.hkulrp2015/010-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats