File Download
  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Realising Universal Suffrage in Hong Kong after the Standing Committee's Decision

TitleRealising Universal Suffrage in Hong Kong after the Standing Committee's Decision
Authors
KeywordsPolitical reform
Hong Kong
Universal suffrage
Chief Executive
Constitutional reform
Issue Date2014
PublisherSweet & Maxwell Asia. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.hku.hk/law/hklj/
Citation
Hong Kong Law Journal, 2014, v. 44 n. 3, p. 689-708 How to Cite?
AbstractOf all the preconditions to realising universal suffrage of Hong Kong’s Chief Executive in 2017, the most challenging is getting two-thirds of the 70 legislators to agree on a reform proposal. On 31 August 2014, the Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress made this challenge even more difficult by imposing restrictive and controlling conditions on the nomination process. The decision sparked unprecedented protests and acts of civil disobedience on the streets of Hong Kong in September and October 2014. Legislators have until the middle of 2015 to determine whether they can agree with the central and local governments on a single reform proposal. This paper assesses the arguments for and against reform, within the constraints of the Standing Committee’s decision. It argues in favour of reform so long as there are sufficient reassurances and measures to regain the trust of the Hong Kong people. The complete reform proposal will need to have sufficient safeguards and counter-balances to ensure that the central government does not control both the nomination and election results. All stakeholders need to take positive steps to make for more favourable reform conditions.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/206403
ISSN
2015 Impact Factor: 0.215
2015 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.101
SSRN
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorYoung, SNM-
dc.date.accessioned2014-10-29T06:04:35Z-
dc.date.available2014-10-29T06:04:35Z-
dc.date.issued2014-
dc.identifier.citationHong Kong Law Journal, 2014, v. 44 n. 3, p. 689-708-
dc.identifier.issn0378-0600-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/206403-
dc.description.abstractOf all the preconditions to realising universal suffrage of Hong Kong’s Chief Executive in 2017, the most challenging is getting two-thirds of the 70 legislators to agree on a reform proposal. On 31 August 2014, the Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress made this challenge even more difficult by imposing restrictive and controlling conditions on the nomination process. The decision sparked unprecedented protests and acts of civil disobedience on the streets of Hong Kong in September and October 2014. Legislators have until the middle of 2015 to determine whether they can agree with the central and local governments on a single reform proposal. This paper assesses the arguments for and against reform, within the constraints of the Standing Committee’s decision. It argues in favour of reform so long as there are sufficient reassurances and measures to regain the trust of the Hong Kong people. The complete reform proposal will need to have sufficient safeguards and counter-balances to ensure that the central government does not control both the nomination and election results. All stakeholders need to take positive steps to make for more favourable reform conditions.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherSweet & Maxwell Asia. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.hku.hk/law/hklj/-
dc.relation.ispartofHong Kong Law Journal-
dc.rightsCreative Commons: Attribution 3.0 Hong Kong License-
dc.subjectPolitical reform-
dc.subjectHong Kong-
dc.subjectUniversal suffrage-
dc.subjectChief Executive-
dc.subjectConstitutional reform-
dc.titleRealising Universal Suffrage in Hong Kong after the Standing Committee's Decisionen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.emailYoung, SNM: snmyoung@hku.hk-
dc.description.naturepreprint-
dc.identifier.doi10.2139/ssrn.2505596-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-84926362588-
dc.identifier.hkuros252238-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000348333500001-
dc.publisher.placeHong Kong-
dc.identifier.ssrn2505596-
dc.identifier.hkulrp2014/039-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats