File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1111/j.1741-2005.2012.01500.x
- WOS: WOS:000212835800009
- Find via
Supplementary
-
Citations:
- Web of Science: 0
- Appears in Collections:
Article: The Incarnation and Jesus’ apparent limitation of knowledge
Title | The Incarnation and Jesus’ apparent limitation of knowledge |
---|---|
Authors | |
Issue Date | 2013 |
Publisher | Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd.. |
Citation | New Blackfriars, 2013, v. 94 n. 1053, p. 583-602 How to Cite? |
Abstract | One of the problems confronting the doctrine of the Incarnation concerns Jesus’ apparent limitation in knowledge. This paper assesses various constructive proposals by modern theologians and philosophers, focusing on three of the most widely discussed solutions, namely Ontological Kenoticism, Two Consciousnesses Model, and Divine Subconscious Model. I argue that despite recent work done on the first two, the difficulties of avoiding the implication that the Logos ceased to be divine (for the first) and the implication of Nestorianism (for the second) remain. I conclude that the most promising solution is to defend Functional Kenoticism and develop the Divine Subconscious Model. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/206301 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 0.2 |
ISI Accession Number ID |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Loke, TEA | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2014-10-23T01:57:09Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2014-10-23T01:57:09Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2013 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | New Blackfriars, 2013, v. 94 n. 1053, p. 583-602 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1741-2005 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/206301 | - |
dc.description.abstract | One of the problems confronting the doctrine of the Incarnation concerns Jesus’ apparent limitation in knowledge. This paper assesses various constructive proposals by modern theologians and philosophers, focusing on three of the most widely discussed solutions, namely Ontological Kenoticism, Two Consciousnesses Model, and Divine Subconscious Model. I argue that despite recent work done on the first two, the difficulties of avoiding the implication that the Logos ceased to be divine (for the first) and the implication of Nestorianism (for the second) remain. I conclude that the most promising solution is to defend Functional Kenoticism and develop the Divine Subconscious Model. | - |
dc.language | eng | - |
dc.publisher | Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd.. | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | New Blackfriars | - |
dc.rights | The definitive version is available at www3.interscience.wiley.com | - |
dc.title | The Incarnation and Jesus’ apparent limitation of knowledge | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.identifier.email | Loke, TEA: qaddeen@yahoo.com | - |
dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1111/j.1741-2005.2012.01500.x | - |
dc.identifier.volume | 94 | - |
dc.identifier.issue | 1053 | - |
dc.identifier.spage | 583 | - |
dc.identifier.epage | 602 | - |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000212835800009 | - |
dc.publisher.place | United Kingdom | - |
dc.identifier.issnl | 0028-4289 | - |