File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: The methodological illumination of a blind spot: Information and communication technology and international research team dynamics in a higher education research program

TitleThe methodological illumination of a blind spot: Information and communication technology and international research team dynamics in a higher education research program
Authors
KeywordsMethodology
Comparative higher education
Academic work
Self-ethnography
Research group dynamics
Issue Date2014
Citation
Higher Education, 2014, v. 67, n. 4, p. 473-495 How to Cite?
AbstractThis self-ethnography complements the other articles in this special issue by spotlighting a set of key challenges facing international research teams. The study is focused on the relationship between information and communication technology (ICT)-based collaboration and research team dynamics. Our diverse team, drawn from researchers in five countries and three projects, argues that an ironic casualty of the powerful, global phenomena we study, is a lack of insight into what happens to generic research team dynamics, when groups are 'stretched' in terms of geographical distance, generations, cultural beliefs, values and norms, as well as disciplinary/specialist traditions. Good intentions are not sufficient to cope with these challenges. This is because of the emerging complexity inherent in many types of international, interdisciplinary fields of study and the complexity of the career trajectories needed to make these studies a reality. Our study underlines that there are no beliefs, values, norms and practices linked to research team dynamics, that hold across the current territory, generations, disciplines, cultures, organizations and individuals leading and conducting comparative studies-and even less reflection on the implications of this fact. Compounding this lack of awareness is a less-than-perfect understanding of the way in which ICT-based collaboration bears on research team dynamics. We assert that a holistic, critical, long-term approach to emerging insights into the global division of academic labor, serves our field better than folk psychology or the methodological parochialism that sustains convention at the expense of creativity. Careful consideration of emergent processes, relationships and linkages that explain how short-term cooperation-within projects-begins to make sense-over careers-illuminates key focal points, which, in turn qualitatively illuminates the way forward concerning conceptualization and problematization of our practice; and novel methodological routes available for those interested in attaining better outcomes, over the long term. © 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/205806
ISSN
2015 Impact Factor: 1.207
2015 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.717
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHoffman, David M.-
dc.contributor.authorBlasi, Brigida-
dc.contributor.authorĆulum, Bojana-
dc.contributor.authorDragšić, Žarko-
dc.contributor.authorEwen, Amy-
dc.contributor.authorHorta, Hugo-
dc.contributor.authorNokkala, Terhi-
dc.contributor.authorRios-Aguilar, Cecilia-
dc.date.accessioned2014-10-06T08:02:23Z-
dc.date.available2014-10-06T08:02:23Z-
dc.date.issued2014-
dc.identifier.citationHigher Education, 2014, v. 67, n. 4, p. 473-495-
dc.identifier.issn0018-1560-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/205806-
dc.description.abstractThis self-ethnography complements the other articles in this special issue by spotlighting a set of key challenges facing international research teams. The study is focused on the relationship between information and communication technology (ICT)-based collaboration and research team dynamics. Our diverse team, drawn from researchers in five countries and three projects, argues that an ironic casualty of the powerful, global phenomena we study, is a lack of insight into what happens to generic research team dynamics, when groups are 'stretched' in terms of geographical distance, generations, cultural beliefs, values and norms, as well as disciplinary/specialist traditions. Good intentions are not sufficient to cope with these challenges. This is because of the emerging complexity inherent in many types of international, interdisciplinary fields of study and the complexity of the career trajectories needed to make these studies a reality. Our study underlines that there are no beliefs, values, norms and practices linked to research team dynamics, that hold across the current territory, generations, disciplines, cultures, organizations and individuals leading and conducting comparative studies-and even less reflection on the implications of this fact. Compounding this lack of awareness is a less-than-perfect understanding of the way in which ICT-based collaboration bears on research team dynamics. We assert that a holistic, critical, long-term approach to emerging insights into the global division of academic labor, serves our field better than folk psychology or the methodological parochialism that sustains convention at the expense of creativity. Careful consideration of emergent processes, relationships and linkages that explain how short-term cooperation-within projects-begins to make sense-over careers-illuminates key focal points, which, in turn qualitatively illuminates the way forward concerning conceptualization and problematization of our practice; and novel methodological routes available for those interested in attaining better outcomes, over the long term. © 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofHigher Education-
dc.subjectMethodology-
dc.subjectComparative higher education-
dc.subjectAcademic work-
dc.subjectSelf-ethnography-
dc.subjectResearch group dynamics-
dc.titleThe methodological illumination of a blind spot: Information and communication technology and international research team dynamics in a higher education research program-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10734-013-9692-y-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-84899447073-
dc.identifier.volume67-
dc.identifier.issue4-
dc.identifier.spage473-
dc.identifier.epage495-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000334425300008-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats