File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Comparison of primary care experiences among adults in general outpatient clinics and private general practice clinics in Hong Kong

TitleComparison of primary care experiences among adults in general outpatient clinics and private general practice clinics in Hong Kong
Authors
Issue Date2010
Citation
BMC Public Health, 2010, v. 10 How to Cite?
AbstractAbstract. Background. The main goal of Hong Kong's publicly-funded general outpatient clinics (GOPCs) is to provide primary medical services for the financially vulnerable. The objective of the current study was to compare the primary care experiences of GOPC users and the users of care provided by private general practitioners (GPs) in Hong Kong via a territory-wide telephone survey. Methods. One thousand adults in Hong Kong aged 18 and above were interviewed by a telephone survey. The modified Chinese translated Primary Care Assessment Tool was used to collect data on respondents' primary care experience. Results. Our results indicated that services provided by GOPC were more often used by female, older, poorer, chronically-ill and less educated population. GOPC participants were also more likely to have visited a specialist or used specialist services (69.7% vs. 52.0%; p < 0.001), although this difference in utilization of specialist services disappeared after adjusting for age (55.7% vs. 52.0%, p = 0.198). Analyses were also performed to asses the relationship between healthcare settings (GOPCs versus private GPs) and primary care quality. Private GP patients achieved higher overall PCAT scores largely due to better accessibility (Mean: 6.88 vs. 8.41, p < 0.001) and person-focused care (Mean: 8.37 vs. 11.69, p < 0.001). Conclusions. Our results showed that patients primarily receiving care from private GPs in Hong Kong reported better primary care experiences than those primarily receiving care from GOPCs. This was largely due to the greater accessibility and better interpersonal relationships offered by the private GPs. As most patients use both GOPCs and private GPs, their overall primary care experiences may not be as different as the findings of this study imply. © 2010 Wong et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/205775
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorWong, Samuel Y. S.-
dc.contributor.authorKung, Kenny-
dc.contributor.authorGriffiths, Siân Meryl-
dc.contributor.authorCarthy, Tanya-
dc.contributor.authorWong, Martincs-
dc.contributor.authorLo, Suvui-
dc.contributor.authorChung, Vincent-
dc.contributor.authorGoggins, William B.-
dc.contributor.authorStarfield, Bárbara H.-
dc.date.accessioned2014-10-06T08:02:20Z-
dc.date.available2014-10-06T08:02:20Z-
dc.date.issued2010-
dc.identifier.citationBMC Public Health, 2010, v. 10-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/205775-
dc.description.abstractAbstract. Background. The main goal of Hong Kong's publicly-funded general outpatient clinics (GOPCs) is to provide primary medical services for the financially vulnerable. The objective of the current study was to compare the primary care experiences of GOPC users and the users of care provided by private general practitioners (GPs) in Hong Kong via a territory-wide telephone survey. Methods. One thousand adults in Hong Kong aged 18 and above were interviewed by a telephone survey. The modified Chinese translated Primary Care Assessment Tool was used to collect data on respondents' primary care experience. Results. Our results indicated that services provided by GOPC were more often used by female, older, poorer, chronically-ill and less educated population. GOPC participants were also more likely to have visited a specialist or used specialist services (69.7% vs. 52.0%; p < 0.001), although this difference in utilization of specialist services disappeared after adjusting for age (55.7% vs. 52.0%, p = 0.198). Analyses were also performed to asses the relationship between healthcare settings (GOPCs versus private GPs) and primary care quality. Private GP patients achieved higher overall PCAT scores largely due to better accessibility (Mean: 6.88 vs. 8.41, p < 0.001) and person-focused care (Mean: 8.37 vs. 11.69, p < 0.001). Conclusions. Our results showed that patients primarily receiving care from private GPs in Hong Kong reported better primary care experiences than those primarily receiving care from GOPCs. This was largely due to the greater accessibility and better interpersonal relationships offered by the private GPs. As most patients use both GOPCs and private GPs, their overall primary care experiences may not be as different as the findings of this study imply. © 2010 Wong et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofBMC Public Health-
dc.titleComparison of primary care experiences among adults in general outpatient clinics and private general practice clinics in Hong Kong-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/1471-2458-10-397-
dc.identifier.pmid20602806-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-77954206338-
dc.identifier.volume10-
dc.identifier.eissn1471-2458-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000281860000002-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats