File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

Supplementary

Conference Paper: Institutions of Poetry from Petrarch to Milton

TitleInstitutions of Poetry from Petrarch to Milton
Authors
Issue Date2014
PublisherThe Renaissance Society of America (RSA).
Citation
The 60th Annual Meeting of the Renaissance Society of America (RSA 2014), New York, NY., 27–29 March 2014. In Meeting Program and Abstract Book, 2014, p. 362 How to Cite?
AbstractWhen Sidney contends that tragedy “maketh Kings feare to be tyrants,” he speaks of fi ction as though it were a redoubtable social power or an unnumbered estate. During the early modern period writers reexamined ideas of poetry’s public value and took an expansive view of the poet’s offi ce — legislator, monument maker, and moral paragon, among others. This paper observes pivotal attempts to make of poetry an institution — a profession that upholds certain norms, a discourse that serves essential social functions, and a vocation and way of life. To establish their art as a major public player, poets and theorists look to models of political and religious authority and fi nd that poetry may compete with, no less than it complements, the ultimate aims of these traditional institutions. Etymologically, an institution is something that stands; this paper explores poetry’s ambitions beyond instructing its readers to constructing itself as an edifi ce of renown.
DescriptionSession: Poetic Institutions
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/204991

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBlumberg, FLen_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-09-20T01:17:03Z-
dc.date.available2014-09-20T01:17:03Z-
dc.date.issued2014en_US
dc.identifier.citationThe 60th Annual Meeting of the Renaissance Society of America (RSA 2014), New York, NY., 27–29 March 2014. In Meeting Program and Abstract Book, 2014, p. 362en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/204991-
dc.descriptionSession: Poetic Institutions-
dc.description.abstractWhen Sidney contends that tragedy “maketh Kings feare to be tyrants,” he speaks of fi ction as though it were a redoubtable social power or an unnumbered estate. During the early modern period writers reexamined ideas of poetry’s public value and took an expansive view of the poet’s offi ce — legislator, monument maker, and moral paragon, among others. This paper observes pivotal attempts to make of poetry an institution — a profession that upholds certain norms, a discourse that serves essential social functions, and a vocation and way of life. To establish their art as a major public player, poets and theorists look to models of political and religious authority and fi nd that poetry may compete with, no less than it complements, the ultimate aims of these traditional institutions. Etymologically, an institution is something that stands; this paper explores poetry’s ambitions beyond instructing its readers to constructing itself as an edifi ce of renown.-
dc.languageengen_US
dc.publisherThe Renaissance Society of America (RSA).-
dc.relation.ispartofAnnual Meeting of the Renaissance Society of America, RSA 2014en_US
dc.titleInstitutions of Poetry from Petrarch to Miltonen_US
dc.typeConference_Paperen_US
dc.identifier.emailBlumberg, FL: blumberg@hku.hken_US
dc.identifier.authorityBlumberg, FL=rp01579en_US
dc.identifier.hkuros237883en_US
dc.identifier.spage362-
dc.identifier.epage362-
dc.publisher.placeUnited States-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats