File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

Supplementary

Conference Paper: The Google Book Search Project

TitleThe Google Book Search Project
Authors
Issue Date2014
PublisherThe Law and Technology Centre, The University of Hong Kong.
Citation
University of Ottawa-University of Hong Kong (Ottawa-HKU) Conference on Technology, Law and the Public Interest, Hong Kong, China, 10-11 April 2014 How to Cite?
AbstractThis presentation looks at the antitrust and copyright issues arising from the Google Book Search (GBS) settlement. It argues that antitrust concerns of the settlement pertaining to exclusivity and pricing should be viewed as “ancillary restraints” to an overall pro-competitive copyright collective. Accordingly, a “rule of reason” framework is developed for evaluating and balancing anti-competitive and pro-competitive effects of the ancillary restraints to the GBS settlement and copyright collectives generally. It concludes that Google’s de facto exclusivity over orphan works and its book pricing mechanisms should be upheld under antitrust law.
DescriptionConference theme: Regulating Technology for the Common Good
Session: Intellectual Property & Social Justice: User’s Rights, Public Interest
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/204728

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKwok, KHFen_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-09-20T00:36:32Z-
dc.date.available2014-09-20T00:36:32Z-
dc.date.issued2014en_US
dc.identifier.citationUniversity of Ottawa-University of Hong Kong (Ottawa-HKU) Conference on Technology, Law and the Public Interest, Hong Kong, China, 10-11 April 2014en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/204728-
dc.descriptionConference theme: Regulating Technology for the Common Gooden_US
dc.descriptionSession: Intellectual Property & Social Justice: User’s Rights, Public Interest-
dc.description.abstractThis presentation looks at the antitrust and copyright issues arising from the Google Book Search (GBS) settlement. It argues that antitrust concerns of the settlement pertaining to exclusivity and pricing should be viewed as “ancillary restraints” to an overall pro-competitive copyright collective. Accordingly, a “rule of reason” framework is developed for evaluating and balancing anti-competitive and pro-competitive effects of the ancillary restraints to the GBS settlement and copyright collectives generally. It concludes that Google’s de facto exclusivity over orphan works and its book pricing mechanisms should be upheld under antitrust law.en_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.publisherThe Law and Technology Centre, The University of Hong Kong.en_US
dc.relation.ispartofUniversity of Ottawa-University of Hong Kong (Ottawa-HKU) Conference on Technology, Law and the Public Interesten_US
dc.titleThe Google Book Search Projecten_US
dc.typeConference_Paperen_US
dc.identifier.emailKwok, KHF: khfkwok@hku.hken_US
dc.identifier.authorityKwok, KHF=rp01637en_US
dc.identifier.hkuros236516en_US
dc.publisher.placeHong Kongen_US

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats