File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Supplementary
-
Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Conference Paper: The Google Book Search Project
Title | The Google Book Search Project |
---|---|
Authors | |
Issue Date | 2014 |
Publisher | The Law and Technology Centre, The University of Hong Kong. |
Citation | University of Ottawa-University of Hong Kong (Ottawa-HKU) Conference on Technology, Law and the Public Interest, Hong Kong, China, 10-11 April 2014 How to Cite? |
Abstract | This presentation looks at the antitrust and copyright issues arising from the Google Book Search (GBS) settlement. It argues that antitrust concerns of the settlement pertaining to exclusivity and pricing should be viewed as “ancillary restraints” to an overall pro-competitive copyright collective. Accordingly, a “rule of reason” framework is developed for evaluating and balancing anti-competitive and pro-competitive effects of the ancillary restraints to the GBS settlement and copyright collectives generally. It concludes that Google’s de facto exclusivity over orphan works and its book pricing mechanisms should be upheld under antitrust law. |
Description | Conference theme: Regulating Technology for the Common Good Session: Intellectual Property & Social Justice: User’s Rights, Public Interest |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/204728 |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Kwok, KHF | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2014-09-20T00:36:32Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2014-09-20T00:36:32Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2014 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | University of Ottawa-University of Hong Kong (Ottawa-HKU) Conference on Technology, Law and the Public Interest, Hong Kong, China, 10-11 April 2014 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/204728 | - |
dc.description | Conference theme: Regulating Technology for the Common Good | en_US |
dc.description | Session: Intellectual Property & Social Justice: User’s Rights, Public Interest | - |
dc.description.abstract | This presentation looks at the antitrust and copyright issues arising from the Google Book Search (GBS) settlement. It argues that antitrust concerns of the settlement pertaining to exclusivity and pricing should be viewed as “ancillary restraints” to an overall pro-competitive copyright collective. Accordingly, a “rule of reason” framework is developed for evaluating and balancing anti-competitive and pro-competitive effects of the ancillary restraints to the GBS settlement and copyright collectives generally. It concludes that Google’s de facto exclusivity over orphan works and its book pricing mechanisms should be upheld under antitrust law. | en_US |
dc.language | eng | en_US |
dc.publisher | The Law and Technology Centre, The University of Hong Kong. | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | University of Ottawa-University of Hong Kong (Ottawa-HKU) Conference on Technology, Law and the Public Interest | en_US |
dc.title | The Google Book Search Project | en_US |
dc.type | Conference_Paper | en_US |
dc.identifier.email | Kwok, KHF: khfkwok@hku.hk | en_US |
dc.identifier.authority | Kwok, KHF=rp01637 | en_US |
dc.identifier.hkuros | 236516 | en_US |
dc.publisher.place | Hong Kong | en_US |