File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Air-conditioning Energy Consumption due to Green Roofs with Different Building Thermal Insulation

TitleAir-conditioning Energy Consumption due to Green Roofs with Different Building Thermal Insulation
Authors
KeywordsAir-conditioning energy consumption
Building heat-sink effect
Building thermal insulation
Extensive green roof
Green-roof heat-sink effect
Thermal insulation breaching
Issue Date2014
PublisherPergamon. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.elsevier.com/locate/apenergy
Citation
Applied Energy, 2014, v. 128, p. 49-59 How to Cite?
AbstractOn hot days, green roofs could reduce heat flux into indoor space and air-conditioning energy use. Most thermal-benefit studies estimate energy saving based on temperature measurements. A field experiment on the roofs of two residential buildings in subtropical Hong Kong was designed to measure air-conditioning electricity consumption in relation to three factors: (1) building thermal insulation (BTI): omitted at Block 1 and installed at Block 2; (2) green-roof type: each block had a bare (Control) and two extensive green-roof plots, namely simple Sedum and more complex herbaceous Peanut vegetation; and (3) three summer weather scenarios: sunny, cloudy, and rainy. Air-conditioning electricity consumption of six vacant apartments below the experimental plots was monitored by precision energy loggers. Under all weather conditions, the unshielded Control imposes high cooling load at Block 1, but BTI at Block 2 cuts heat ingress. Sedum reduces more energy consumption than Control at both blocks, with Block 2 better than Block 1. The best effect occurs on sunny day, followed by cloudy and rainy. Sedum roof with BTI enhances thermal benefit. Without BTI, Sedum roof consumes more energy, hence the simple green roof cannot substitute BTI function. Under three weather scenarios, Peanut uses more electricity at Block 2 than Block 1, indicating the joint operation of green-roof heat-sink effect (GHE) and building heat-sink effect (BHE) at Block 2. Thicker substrate with higher moisture-holding capacity generates GHE. Added BTI material layers create BHE, with thermal resistance reduced by moisture penetration and elevated temperature. Their joint effect has raised thermal mass and thermal capacity. A rather steep thermal gradient is formed to induce thermal-insulation breaching to push heat into indoor space. At Block 1, Peanut roof can partly compensate for omission of BTI. At Block 2, however, Peanut coupled with BTI can synergistically increase cooling load. The findings can inform policies and design of green roof and associated BTI in cities with hot summer.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/203579
ISSN
2021 Impact Factor: 11.446
2020 SCImago Journal Rankings: 3.035
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorJim, CY-
dc.date.accessioned2014-09-19T15:28:06Z-
dc.date.available2014-09-19T15:28:06Z-
dc.date.issued2014-
dc.identifier.citationApplied Energy, 2014, v. 128, p. 49-59-
dc.identifier.issn0306-2619-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/203579-
dc.description.abstractOn hot days, green roofs could reduce heat flux into indoor space and air-conditioning energy use. Most thermal-benefit studies estimate energy saving based on temperature measurements. A field experiment on the roofs of two residential buildings in subtropical Hong Kong was designed to measure air-conditioning electricity consumption in relation to three factors: (1) building thermal insulation (BTI): omitted at Block 1 and installed at Block 2; (2) green-roof type: each block had a bare (Control) and two extensive green-roof plots, namely simple Sedum and more complex herbaceous Peanut vegetation; and (3) three summer weather scenarios: sunny, cloudy, and rainy. Air-conditioning electricity consumption of six vacant apartments below the experimental plots was monitored by precision energy loggers. Under all weather conditions, the unshielded Control imposes high cooling load at Block 1, but BTI at Block 2 cuts heat ingress. Sedum reduces more energy consumption than Control at both blocks, with Block 2 better than Block 1. The best effect occurs on sunny day, followed by cloudy and rainy. Sedum roof with BTI enhances thermal benefit. Without BTI, Sedum roof consumes more energy, hence the simple green roof cannot substitute BTI function. Under three weather scenarios, Peanut uses more electricity at Block 2 than Block 1, indicating the joint operation of green-roof heat-sink effect (GHE) and building heat-sink effect (BHE) at Block 2. Thicker substrate with higher moisture-holding capacity generates GHE. Added BTI material layers create BHE, with thermal resistance reduced by moisture penetration and elevated temperature. Their joint effect has raised thermal mass and thermal capacity. A rather steep thermal gradient is formed to induce thermal-insulation breaching to push heat into indoor space. At Block 1, Peanut roof can partly compensate for omission of BTI. At Block 2, however, Peanut coupled with BTI can synergistically increase cooling load. The findings can inform policies and design of green roof and associated BTI in cities with hot summer.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherPergamon. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.elsevier.com/locate/apenergy-
dc.relation.ispartofApplied Energy-
dc.rightsNOTICE: this is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Applied Energy. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Applied Energy, vol 128, 2014. DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.04.055en_US
dc.subjectAir-conditioning energy consumption-
dc.subjectBuilding heat-sink effect-
dc.subjectBuilding thermal insulation-
dc.subjectExtensive green roof-
dc.subjectGreen-roof heat-sink effect-
dc.subjectThermal insulation breaching-
dc.titleAir-conditioning Energy Consumption due to Green Roofs with Different Building Thermal Insulation-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.emailJim, CY: hragjcy@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.authorityJim, CY=rp00549-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.04.055-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-84899903556-
dc.identifier.hkuros239246-
dc.identifier.volume128-
dc.identifier.spage49-
dc.identifier.epage59-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000337776500005-
dc.publisher.placeUnited Kingdom-
dc.identifier.issnl0306-2619-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats