File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Idiosyncratic deals and employee outcomes: The mediating roles of social exchange and self-enhancement and the moderating role of individualism

TitleIdiosyncratic deals and employee outcomes: The mediating roles of social exchange and self-enhancement and the moderating role of individualism
Authors
Issue Date2013
Citation
Journal of Applied Psychology, 2013, v. 98, p. 832-840 How to Cite?
AbstractThe majority of studies on idiosyncratic employment arrangements (“i-deals”) are based on social exchange theory. The authors suggest that self-enhancement theory, in addition to social exchange, can be used to explain the effects of i-deals. Using a multisource sample including 230 employees and 102 supervisors from 2 Chinese companies, the authors adopt a 3-wave lagged design to examine the mediating roles of social exchange and self-enhancement and the moderating role of individualism in the relationships between i-deals and employee outcomes, as indicated by proactive behaviors and affective commitment. The results of bootstrapping analyses confirm the mediating effects of social exchange and self-enhancement. In addition, employees with high levels of individualism are more receptive to self-enhancement effects; in contrast, employees with low levels of individualism are more receptive to social exchange effects.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/203543

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLiu, Jen_US
dc.contributor.authorLee, Cen_US
dc.contributor.authorHui, Cen_US
dc.contributor.authorKwan, H.K.en_US
dc.contributor.authorWu, L.Z.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-09-19T15:26:59Z-
dc.date.available2014-09-19T15:26:59Z-
dc.date.issued2013en_US
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Applied Psychology, 2013, v. 98, p. 832-840en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/203543-
dc.description.abstractThe majority of studies on idiosyncratic employment arrangements (“i-deals”) are based on social exchange theory. The authors suggest that self-enhancement theory, in addition to social exchange, can be used to explain the effects of i-deals. Using a multisource sample including 230 employees and 102 supervisors from 2 Chinese companies, the authors adopt a 3-wave lagged design to examine the mediating roles of social exchange and self-enhancement and the moderating role of individualism in the relationships between i-deals and employee outcomes, as indicated by proactive behaviors and affective commitment. The results of bootstrapping analyses confirm the mediating effects of social exchange and self-enhancement. In addition, employees with high levels of individualism are more receptive to self-enhancement effects; in contrast, employees with low levels of individualism are more receptive to social exchange effects.en_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Applied Psychologyen_US
dc.titleIdiosyncratic deals and employee outcomes: The mediating roles of social exchange and self-enhancement and the moderating role of individualismen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.emailHui, C: chui@business.hku.hken_US
dc.identifier.authorityHui, C=rp01069en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1037/a0032571-
dc.identifier.pmid23544480-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-84884260702-
dc.identifier.hkuros237443en_US
dc.identifier.volume98en_US
dc.identifier.spage832en_US
dc.identifier.epage840en_US

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats