File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
  • Find via Find It@HKUL
Supplementary

Article: Participatory policy making under authoritarianism: the pathways of local budgetary reform in the People’s Republic of China

TitleParticipatory policy making under authoritarianism: the pathways of local budgetary reform in the People’s Republic of China
Authors
KeywordsAuthoritarianism
Participatory reform
Public budget
Issue Date2014
PublisherThe Policy Press. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.policypress.co.uk/journals_pap.asp?
Citation
Policy and Politics (In press), 2014 How to Cite?
AbstractCitizen participation in policy making is essential in democracies, but there is much less understanding of the process and substance of it in non-democratic states. Taking local budgetary process as an example, this article compares three pathways of participatory reform undertaken by the communist regime in China, namely the representative pathway, the consultative pathway and the transparency pathway. All three are initiated and administered by the local governments, but differ in a number of crucial aspects from the level of institutionalisation to the form of state–citizenry interaction. These three pathways provide directions the Party-state might consider for nationwide policy reform.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/203346
ISSN
2015 Impact Factor: 1.2
2015 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.752

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorYan, X-
dc.contributor.authorXIN, G-
dc.date.accessioned2014-09-19T14:13:26Z-
dc.date.available2014-09-19T14:13:26Z-
dc.date.issued2014-
dc.identifier.citationPolicy and Politics (In press), 2014-
dc.identifier.issn0305-5736-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/203346-
dc.description.abstractCitizen participation in policy making is essential in democracies, but there is much less understanding of the process and substance of it in non-democratic states. Taking local budgetary process as an example, this article compares three pathways of participatory reform undertaken by the communist regime in China, namely the representative pathway, the consultative pathway and the transparency pathway. All three are initiated and administered by the local governments, but differ in a number of crucial aspects from the level of institutionalisation to the form of state–citizenry interaction. These three pathways provide directions the Party-state might consider for nationwide policy reform.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherThe Policy Press. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.policypress.co.uk/journals_pap.asp?-
dc.relation.ispartofPolicy and Politics-
dc.subjectAuthoritarianism-
dc.subjectParticipatory reform-
dc.subjectPublic budget-
dc.titleParticipatory policy making under authoritarianism: the pathways of local budgetary reform in the People’s Republic of China-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.emailYan, X: xyan@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.authorityYan, X=rp00644-
dc.identifier.hkuros235845-
dc.publisher.placeUnited Kingdom-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats