File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Electronic Cigarettes: A Position Statement of the Forum of International Respiratory Societies.

TitleElectronic Cigarettes: A Position Statement of the Forum of International Respiratory Societies.
Authors
Issue Date2014
PublisherAmerican Thoracic Society. The Journal's web site is located at http://ajrccm.atsjournals.org
Citation
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 2014 How to Cite?
AbstractBackground: Awareness and usage of electronic cigarettes has exponentially increased during the last few years. The rapid acceptance of electronic cigarettes may be attributed in part to the perception created by marketing and the popular press that they are safer than combustible cigarettes. Goals: To alert and advise policy makers about electronic cigarettes and their potential hazards. Methods: Using the Union's position paper on electronic cigarettes as the starting template, the document was written using an iterative process. Portions of the manuscript have been taken directly from the position papers of participating societies. Results: Since electronic cigarettes generate less tar and carcinogens than combustible cigarettes, use electronic cigarettes may reduce disease caused by those components. However, the health risks of electronic cigarettes have not been adequately studied. Studies looking at whether electronic cigarettes can aid smoking cessation have had inconsistent results. Moreover, the availability of electronic cigarettes may have an overall adverse health impact by increasing initiation and reducing cessation of combustible nicotine delivery products. Conclusions: The health and safety claims regarding electronic nicotine delivery devices should be subject to evidentiary review. The potential benefits of electronic cigarettes to an individual smoker should be weighed against potential harm to the population of increased social acceptability of smoking and use of nicotine, the latter of which has addictive power and untoward effects. As a precaution, electronic nicotine delivery devices should be restricted or banned until more information about their safety is available. If they are allowed, they should be closely regulated as medicines or tobacco products
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/203103

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSchraufnagel, DEen_US
dc.contributor.authorBlasi, Fen_US
dc.contributor.authorDrummond, MBen_US
dc.contributor.authorLam, CLDen_US
dc.contributor.authorLatif, Een_US
dc.contributor.authorRosen, MJen_US
dc.contributor.authorSansores, Ren_US
dc.contributor.authorVan Zyl-Smit, Ren_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-09-19T11:30:42Z-
dc.date.available2014-09-19T11:30:42Z-
dc.date.issued2014en_US
dc.identifier.citationAmerican Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 2014en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/203103-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Awareness and usage of electronic cigarettes has exponentially increased during the last few years. The rapid acceptance of electronic cigarettes may be attributed in part to the perception created by marketing and the popular press that they are safer than combustible cigarettes. Goals: To alert and advise policy makers about electronic cigarettes and their potential hazards. Methods: Using the Union's position paper on electronic cigarettes as the starting template, the document was written using an iterative process. Portions of the manuscript have been taken directly from the position papers of participating societies. Results: Since electronic cigarettes generate less tar and carcinogens than combustible cigarettes, use electronic cigarettes may reduce disease caused by those components. However, the health risks of electronic cigarettes have not been adequately studied. Studies looking at whether electronic cigarettes can aid smoking cessation have had inconsistent results. Moreover, the availability of electronic cigarettes may have an overall adverse health impact by increasing initiation and reducing cessation of combustible nicotine delivery products. Conclusions: The health and safety claims regarding electronic nicotine delivery devices should be subject to evidentiary review. The potential benefits of electronic cigarettes to an individual smoker should be weighed against potential harm to the population of increased social acceptability of smoking and use of nicotine, the latter of which has addictive power and untoward effects. As a precaution, electronic nicotine delivery devices should be restricted or banned until more information about their safety is available. If they are allowed, they should be closely regulated as medicines or tobacco productsen_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.publisherAmerican Thoracic Society. The Journal's web site is located at http://ajrccm.atsjournals.orgen_US
dc.relation.ispartofAmerican Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicineen_US
dc.titleElectronic Cigarettes: A Position Statement of the Forum of International Respiratory Societies.en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.emailLam, CLD: dcllam@hku.hken_US
dc.identifier.authorityLam, CLD=rp01345en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1164/rccm.201407-1198PP-
dc.identifier.pmid25006874-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-84908105544-
dc.identifier.hkuros237759en_US

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats