File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
  • Find via Find It@HKUL
Supplementary

Article: A Critical Study of "Guoyu (part 1)" in Wang Yinzhi’s Jingyi Shuwen

TitleA Critical Study of "Guoyu (part 1)" in Wang Yinzhi’s Jingyi Shuwen
王引之《經義述聞‧國語上》斠正
Authors
Keywords王念孫
王引之
《經義述聞》
《國語》
經學
Issue Date2013
Publisher上海古籍出版社. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.guoxue.com/?magname=rwzgxb
Citation
人文中國學報, 2013, v. 19, p. 205-221 How to Cite?
Sino-Humanitas, 2013, v. 19, p. 205-221 How to Cite?
AbstractWang Niansun (1744-1832) and his son Wang Yinzhi (1766-1834) of Gaoyou (in modern Jiangsu province) were both representatives of the Qianlong-Jiaqing (mid 18th to early 19th centuries) intellectual school. Their expertise in philology enabled them to read the classics with unprecedented insights. Their Jingyi Shuwen (General Exegeses of the Classics) marks the highest accompilshment. Although the book is highly influential, it is not free from errors in the comprehension of texts, and in etymological and syntactic analyses. This essay focuses on some such examples taken from the chapter on the Guoyu (Discourses of the States) (part 1) and discusses the nature of these problems.
高郵王念孫、王引之父子,爲乾嘉樸學的代表人物。二王以其深湛的小學修爲,出入於經典之中,屢有創獲,其《經義述聞》更是經學名著,影響深遠。然而,在辯解疑難之餘,亦偶見未安之處,如文義的理解、字形的掌握或語法的分析等,均有值得商榷的例子。今就《經義述聞.國語上》,擇其可議之處,加以檢討,以察其問題所在。
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/201660
ISSN

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSiu, KWen_US
dc.contributor.authorKwok, PFen_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-08-21T07:34:46Z-
dc.date.available2014-08-21T07:34:46Z-
dc.date.issued2013en_US
dc.identifier.citation人文中國學報, 2013, v. 19, p. 205-221en_US
dc.identifier.citationSino-Humanitas, 2013, v. 19, p. 205-221en_US
dc.identifier.issn1562-2754en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/201660-
dc.description.abstractWang Niansun (1744-1832) and his son Wang Yinzhi (1766-1834) of Gaoyou (in modern Jiangsu province) were both representatives of the Qianlong-Jiaqing (mid 18th to early 19th centuries) intellectual school. Their expertise in philology enabled them to read the classics with unprecedented insights. Their Jingyi Shuwen (General Exegeses of the Classics) marks the highest accompilshment. Although the book is highly influential, it is not free from errors in the comprehension of texts, and in etymological and syntactic analyses. This essay focuses on some such examples taken from the chapter on the Guoyu (Discourses of the States) (part 1) and discusses the nature of these problems.en_US
dc.description.abstract高郵王念孫、王引之父子,爲乾嘉樸學的代表人物。二王以其深湛的小學修爲,出入於經典之中,屢有創獲,其《經義述聞》更是經學名著,影響深遠。然而,在辯解疑難之餘,亦偶見未安之處,如文義的理解、字形的掌握或語法的分析等,均有值得商榷的例子。今就《經義述聞.國語上》,擇其可議之處,加以檢討,以察其問題所在。-
dc.languagechien_US
dc.publisher上海古籍出版社. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.guoxue.com/?magname=rwzgxben_US
dc.relation.ispartof人文中國學報en_US
dc.relation.ispartofSino-Humanitasen_US
dc.subject王念孫-
dc.subject王引之-
dc.subject《經義述聞》-
dc.subject《國語》-
dc.subject經學-
dc.titleA Critical Study of "Guoyu (part 1)" in Wang Yinzhi’s Jingyi Shuwenen_US
dc.title王引之《經義述聞‧國語上》斠正-
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.emailSiu, KW: kingwaisiu@hku.hken_US
dc.identifier.hkuros234897en_US
dc.identifier.volume19en_US
dc.identifier.spage205en_US
dc.identifier.epage221en_US
dc.publisher.placeChinaen_US

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats