File Download
  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
  • Find via Find It@HKUL
Supplementary

Article: Responsive Justice in China during Transitional Times: Revisiting the Juggling Path between Adjudicatory and Mediatory Justice

TitleResponsive Justice in China during Transitional Times: Revisiting the Juggling Path between Adjudicatory and Mediatory Justice
Authors
Issue Date2015
PublisherWashington University, School of Law. The Journal's web site is located at http://law.wustl.edu/WUGSLR/
Citation
Washington University Global Studies Law Review, 2015, v. 14 n. 1, p. 49-85 How to Cite?
AbstractChina has been discussed in international literature as a transitional state in both social and economic senses; however, scholarly literature analyzing how China’s justice system responds to the country’s social and economic transitions is scant. This Article studies the international “transitional justice” framework that examines justice systems in economic, societal, and political transition in post-Communism Central and Eastern European (CEE) jurisdictions. Although China is not a transitional state in a political sense, the transitional justice framework, particularly its analyses on how successor regimes in CEE countries deal with the aftermath of economic restructuring and societal reparations through the justice system, is of relevance to China’s ongoing judicial reforms and its future development. By comparing the judicial situation in China to that of CEE countries during transitional times, this Article attempts to analyze China’s distinctive judicial response to her massive economic and societal transformation so as to conceptualize “responsive justice” in China during transitional times.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/200638
ISSN

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGu, W-
dc.date.accessioned2014-08-21T06:53:34Z-
dc.date.available2014-08-21T06:53:34Z-
dc.date.issued2015-
dc.identifier.citationWashington University Global Studies Law Review, 2015, v. 14 n. 1, p. 49-85-
dc.identifier.issn1546-6981-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/200638-
dc.description.abstractChina has been discussed in international literature as a transitional state in both social and economic senses; however, scholarly literature analyzing how China’s justice system responds to the country’s social and economic transitions is scant. This Article studies the international “transitional justice” framework that examines justice systems in economic, societal, and political transition in post-Communism Central and Eastern European (CEE) jurisdictions. Although China is not a transitional state in a political sense, the transitional justice framework, particularly its analyses on how successor regimes in CEE countries deal with the aftermath of economic restructuring and societal reparations through the justice system, is of relevance to China’s ongoing judicial reforms and its future development. By comparing the judicial situation in China to that of CEE countries during transitional times, this Article attempts to analyze China’s distinctive judicial response to her massive economic and societal transformation so as to conceptualize “responsive justice” in China during transitional times.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherWashington University, School of Law. The Journal's web site is located at http://law.wustl.edu/WUGSLR/-
dc.relation.ispartofWashington University Global Studies Law Review-
dc.titleResponsive Justice in China during Transitional Times: Revisiting the Juggling Path between Adjudicatory and Mediatory Justice-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.emailGu, W: guweixia@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.authorityGu, W=rp01249-
dc.description.naturelink_to_OA_fulltext-
dc.identifier.hkuros234387-
dc.identifier.volume14-
dc.identifier.issue1-
dc.identifier.spage49-
dc.identifier.epage85-
dc.publisher.placeUnited States-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats