File Download
  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Current perspectives on the role of ridge (socket) preservation procedures in dental implant treatment in the aesthetic zone

TitleCurrent perspectives on the role of ridge (socket) preservation procedures in dental implant treatment in the aesthetic zone
Authors
Issue Date2014
PublisherWiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd.. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.wiley.com/bw/journal.asp?ref=0045-0421
Citation
Australian Dental Journal, 2014, v. 59 n. 1, p. 48-56 How to Cite?
AbstractAugmentation of the extraction socket (ridge preservation) is increasingly being advocated in anticipation of implant placement. The aim of this article is to review the available evidence with regards to ridge preservation procedures, investigating whether these techniques improve dental implant treatment outcomes. Evidence is examined to compare these techniques to other treatment alternatives such as implant placement with simultaneous lateral augmentation. An electronic PubMed search was conducted using search terms relevant to assessing treatment outcomes in association with ridge preservation. Titles were screened and full text obtained where relevant. Further full text articles were obtained from analysis of those papers yielded from the original search. Twenty-two papers were finally selected for analysis. Ridge preservation techniques are effective in minimizing post-extraction alveolar ridge contraction. However, there is insufficient evidence to suggest that the use of these techniques in conjunction with dental implant treatment improves implant treatment outcomes. Furthermore, ridge preservation does not necessarily eliminate the need for further simultaneous augmentation at the time of implant placement. The delayed healing associated with ridge preservation using socket grafting necessitates a commitment to a delayed placement protocol. The extended treatment time, compromised healing and expense related to ridge preservation suggests a more cautious approach with regards to the indication of such techniques.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/200408
ISSN
2015 Impact Factor: 1.272
2015 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.482

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKassim, Ben_US
dc.contributor.authorIvanovski, Sen_US
dc.contributor.authorMattheos, Nen_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-08-21T06:45:16Z-
dc.date.available2014-08-21T06:45:16Z-
dc.date.issued2014-
dc.identifier.citationAustralian Dental Journal, 2014, v. 59 n. 1, p. 48-56en_US
dc.identifier.issn0045-0421-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/200408-
dc.description.abstractAugmentation of the extraction socket (ridge preservation) is increasingly being advocated in anticipation of implant placement. The aim of this article is to review the available evidence with regards to ridge preservation procedures, investigating whether these techniques improve dental implant treatment outcomes. Evidence is examined to compare these techniques to other treatment alternatives such as implant placement with simultaneous lateral augmentation. An electronic PubMed search was conducted using search terms relevant to assessing treatment outcomes in association with ridge preservation. Titles were screened and full text obtained where relevant. Further full text articles were obtained from analysis of those papers yielded from the original search. Twenty-two papers were finally selected for analysis. Ridge preservation techniques are effective in minimizing post-extraction alveolar ridge contraction. However, there is insufficient evidence to suggest that the use of these techniques in conjunction with dental implant treatment improves implant treatment outcomes. Furthermore, ridge preservation does not necessarily eliminate the need for further simultaneous augmentation at the time of implant placement. The delayed healing associated with ridge preservation using socket grafting necessitates a commitment to a delayed placement protocol. The extended treatment time, compromised healing and expense related to ridge preservation suggests a more cautious approach with regards to the indication of such techniques.-
dc.languageengen_US
dc.publisherWiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd.. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.wiley.com/bw/journal.asp?ref=0045-0421-
dc.relation.ispartofAustralian Dental Journalen_US
dc.subject.meshAlveolar Process - surgery-
dc.subject.meshBone Substitutes - therapeutic use-
dc.subject.meshDental Implants-
dc.subject.meshGuided Tissue Regeneration, Periodontal - methods-
dc.subject.meshOrgan Sparing Treatments - methods-
dc.titleCurrent perspectives on the role of ridge (socket) preservation procedures in dental implant treatment in the aesthetic zoneen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.emailMattheos, N: mattheos@hku.hken_US
dc.identifier.authorityMattheos, N=rp01662en_US
dc.description.naturelink_to_OA_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/adj.12098-
dc.identifier.pmid24588310-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-84894818491-
dc.identifier.hkuros232601en_US
dc.identifier.volume59en_US
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.spage48en_US
dc.identifier.epage56en_US
dc.publisher.placeUnited Kingdom-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats