File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Mandible reconstruction assisted by preoperative simulation and transferring templates: Cadaveric study of accuracy

TitleMandible reconstruction assisted by preoperative simulation and transferring templates: Cadaveric study of accuracy
Authors
Issue Date2012
Citation
Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 2012, v. 70, n. 6, p. 1480-1485 How to Cite?
AbstractPurpose: In this study we tried to define tumor resection, fibula cutting, and positioning by surgical templates to perform the mandible reconstruction surgery according to the preoperative simulation. The accuracy was evaluated through cadaveric surgery. Materials and Methods: Five cadaveric mandibles and fibulas were obtained. Preoperative surgical simulation was performed. Surgical templates that defined tumor resection, fibula cutting, and positioning were designed and fabricated. Translation, angular deviation, and rotation of bone grafts, as well as translation of condyles, were measured. Results: The reconstructed mandibles showed high similarity to the surgical planning. The mean translation, angular deviation, and rotation of fibula segments of the reconstructed mandibles were 1.35 ± 0.86 mm, 3.36° ± 1.86°, and 8.13° ± 5.35°, respectively. In the mandible remnants, the translation of condyles was measured, with a mean of 1.39 ± 0.66 mm. Conclusions: Our method of defining the tumor resection, fibula cutting, and positioning by surgical templates was accurate enough for mandible reconstruction surgery. © 2012 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/200097
ISSN
2015 Impact Factor: 1.631
2015 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.824
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorZheng, Guangsen-
dc.contributor.authorSu, Yuxiong-
dc.contributor.authorLiao, Guiqing-
dc.contributor.authorJiao, Peifeng-
dc.contributor.authorLiang, Lizhong-
dc.contributor.authorZhang, Sien-
dc.contributor.authorLiu, Haichao-
dc.date.accessioned2014-07-26T23:11:08Z-
dc.date.available2014-07-26T23:11:08Z-
dc.date.issued2012-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 2012, v. 70, n. 6, p. 1480-1485-
dc.identifier.issn0278-2391-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/200097-
dc.description.abstractPurpose: In this study we tried to define tumor resection, fibula cutting, and positioning by surgical templates to perform the mandible reconstruction surgery according to the preoperative simulation. The accuracy was evaluated through cadaveric surgery. Materials and Methods: Five cadaveric mandibles and fibulas were obtained. Preoperative surgical simulation was performed. Surgical templates that defined tumor resection, fibula cutting, and positioning were designed and fabricated. Translation, angular deviation, and rotation of bone grafts, as well as translation of condyles, were measured. Results: The reconstructed mandibles showed high similarity to the surgical planning. The mean translation, angular deviation, and rotation of fibula segments of the reconstructed mandibles were 1.35 ± 0.86 mm, 3.36° ± 1.86°, and 8.13° ± 5.35°, respectively. In the mandible remnants, the translation of condyles was measured, with a mean of 1.39 ± 0.66 mm. Conclusions: Our method of defining the tumor resection, fibula cutting, and positioning by surgical templates was accurate enough for mandible reconstruction surgery. © 2012 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery-
dc.titleMandible reconstruction assisted by preoperative simulation and transferring templates: Cadaveric study of accuracy-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.joms.2011.05.015-
dc.identifier.pmid21824704-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-84861228325-
dc.identifier.volume70-
dc.identifier.issue6-
dc.identifier.spage1480-
dc.identifier.epage1485-
dc.identifier.eissn1531-5053-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000304672700039-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats