File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: The cost-effectiveness of supportive periodontal care: A global perspective

TitleThe cost-effectiveness of supportive periodontal care: A global perspective
Authors
Keywordscost-effectiveness
supportive periodontal care
periodontal disease
health economics
Issue Date2011
Citation
Journal of Clinical Periodontology, 2011, v. 38, n. 6, p. 553-561 How to Cite?
AbstractAim: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of supportive periodontal care (SPC) provided in generalist and periodontal specialist practices under publicly subsidized or private dental care. Material and methods: SPC cost data and the costs of replacing teeth were synthesized with estimates of the effectiveness of SPC in preventing attachment and tooth loss and adjusted for differences in clinician's time. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were calculated for both outcomes assuming a time horizon of 30 years. Results: SPC in specialist periodontal practice provides improved outcomes but at higher costs than SPC provided by publicly subsidized or private systems. SPC in specialist periodontal practice is usually more cost-effective than in private dental practice. For private dental practices in Spain, United Kingdom and Australia, specialist SPC is cost-effective at modest values of attachment loss averted. Variation in the threshold arises primarily from clinician's time. Conclusion: SPC in specialist periodontal practice represents good value for money for patients (publicly subsidized or private) in the United Kingdom and Australia and in Spain if they place relatively modest values on avoiding attachment loss. For patients in Ireland, Germany, Japan and the United State, a higher valuation on avoiding attachment loss is needed to justify SPC in private or specialist practices. © 2011 John Wiley & Sons A/S.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/200018
ISSN
2015 Impact Factor: 3.915
2015 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.848
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPennington, Mark William-
dc.contributor.authorHeasman, Peter A.-
dc.contributor.authorGaunt, Francesca L.-
dc.contributor.authorGüntsch, Arndt-
dc.contributor.authorIvanovski, Saso-
dc.contributor.authorImazato, Satoshi-
dc.contributor.authorRajapakse, Sunethra-
dc.contributor.authorAllen, Edith M.-
dc.contributor.authorFlemmig, Thomas Frank-
dc.contributor.authorSanz, Mariano Belén-
dc.contributor.authorVernazza, Chris R.-
dc.date.accessioned2014-07-26T23:11:02Z-
dc.date.available2014-07-26T23:11:02Z-
dc.date.issued2011-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Clinical Periodontology, 2011, v. 38, n. 6, p. 553-561-
dc.identifier.issn0303-6979-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/200018-
dc.description.abstractAim: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of supportive periodontal care (SPC) provided in generalist and periodontal specialist practices under publicly subsidized or private dental care. Material and methods: SPC cost data and the costs of replacing teeth were synthesized with estimates of the effectiveness of SPC in preventing attachment and tooth loss and adjusted for differences in clinician's time. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were calculated for both outcomes assuming a time horizon of 30 years. Results: SPC in specialist periodontal practice provides improved outcomes but at higher costs than SPC provided by publicly subsidized or private systems. SPC in specialist periodontal practice is usually more cost-effective than in private dental practice. For private dental practices in Spain, United Kingdom and Australia, specialist SPC is cost-effective at modest values of attachment loss averted. Variation in the threshold arises primarily from clinician's time. Conclusion: SPC in specialist periodontal practice represents good value for money for patients (publicly subsidized or private) in the United Kingdom and Australia and in Spain if they place relatively modest values on avoiding attachment loss. For patients in Ireland, Germany, Japan and the United State, a higher valuation on avoiding attachment loss is needed to justify SPC in private or specialist practices. © 2011 John Wiley & Sons A/S.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Clinical Periodontology-
dc.subjectcost-effectiveness-
dc.subjectsupportive periodontal care-
dc.subjectperiodontal disease-
dc.subjecthealth economics-
dc.titleThe cost-effectiveness of supportive periodontal care: A global perspective-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1600-051X.2011.01722.x-
dc.identifier.pmid21554375-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-79955923567-
dc.identifier.volume38-
dc.identifier.issue6-
dc.identifier.spage553-
dc.identifier.epage561-
dc.identifier.eissn1600-051X-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000290408400007-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats