File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Sialoendoscopic Secondary Intervention After Failure of Open Sialolithectomy

TitleSialoendoscopic Secondary Intervention After Failure of Open Sialolithectomy
Authors
Issue Date2010
Citation
Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 2010, v. 68, n. 2, p. 313-318 How to Cite?
AbstractPurpose: Traditionally, sialoadenectomy was always indicated when open sialolithectomy failed. The aim of the present study was to investigate the role of sialoendoscopy as the secondary intervention after failure of open sialolithectomy. Patients and Methods: A consecutive series of 15 patients with obstructive salivary gland disease with failure of open sialolithectomy were prospectively recruited for our study. All these patients underwent sialoendoscopy under local anesthesia. The reasons for the failure of open sialolithectomy were analyzed, and secondary interventions were performed using sialoendoscopy. Results: Failure of open sialolithectomy resulted from 4 main causes. Small stones could not be found after the duct was incised (n = 3); the stones were pushed posteriorly during open surgery (n = 4); the stones located in the anterior part of the duct were removed, but the hilar stones were left untouched (n = 5); and radiolucent stones were missed (n = 3). All the patients were treated successfully by sialoendoscopy. No symptoms or signs of recurrence developed during a median follow-up period of 16 months. Conclusions: Sialoendoscopy can be recommended as an effective secondary intervention after failure of open sialolithectomy. © 2010 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/199991
ISSN
2015 Impact Factor: 1.631
2015 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.824
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSu, Yuxiong-
dc.contributor.authorWang, Lin-
dc.contributor.authorLiao, Guiqing-
dc.contributor.authorLiu, Haichao-
dc.contributor.authorLiang, Yujie-
dc.contributor.authorZheng, Guangsen-
dc.date.accessioned2014-07-26T23:11:00Z-
dc.date.available2014-07-26T23:11:00Z-
dc.date.issued2010-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 2010, v. 68, n. 2, p. 313-318-
dc.identifier.issn0278-2391-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/199991-
dc.description.abstractPurpose: Traditionally, sialoadenectomy was always indicated when open sialolithectomy failed. The aim of the present study was to investigate the role of sialoendoscopy as the secondary intervention after failure of open sialolithectomy. Patients and Methods: A consecutive series of 15 patients with obstructive salivary gland disease with failure of open sialolithectomy were prospectively recruited for our study. All these patients underwent sialoendoscopy under local anesthesia. The reasons for the failure of open sialolithectomy were analyzed, and secondary interventions were performed using sialoendoscopy. Results: Failure of open sialolithectomy resulted from 4 main causes. Small stones could not be found after the duct was incised (n = 3); the stones were pushed posteriorly during open surgery (n = 4); the stones located in the anterior part of the duct were removed, but the hilar stones were left untouched (n = 5); and radiolucent stones were missed (n = 3). All the patients were treated successfully by sialoendoscopy. No symptoms or signs of recurrence developed during a median follow-up period of 16 months. Conclusions: Sialoendoscopy can be recommended as an effective secondary intervention after failure of open sialolithectomy. © 2010 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery-
dc.titleSialoendoscopic Secondary Intervention After Failure of Open Sialolithectomy-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.joms.2009.07.031-
dc.identifier.pmid20116701-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-73949100368-
dc.identifier.volume68-
dc.identifier.issue2-
dc.identifier.spage313-
dc.identifier.epage318-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000279280700013-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats